If both sources are saying the same thing, maybe you should take away that not all news from a Russian source is automatically bullshit, and not that the Economist is a pro-Putin propaganda outlet.
If both sources are saying the same thing, maybe you should take away that not all news from a Russian source is automatically bullshit, and not that the Economist is a pro-Putin propaganda outlet.
You realize that first source they linked is the Economist lol? Is that a pro-Russian propaganda outlet?
Yeah, just like how the Russians are currently privatizing everything they get their hands on in Ukraine. Oh wait.
https://privatization.gov.ua/en/
Privatization is encouraged by all the neoliberal governments, not just Russia, and they all want to dismantle any remaining vestiges of public ownership over the economy.
They’re at least building green energy and trains lol. And less wars. Already better.
Even if that shock happens, China will still be in a better situation. Like, they actually manufacture stuff there, and the government builds infrastructure aggressively. That’s two massive benefits to economic security and health.
Nazi’s gonna nazi.
That’s awful, those poor people.
Italy has been prosecuting people who try to help them, who provide aid and rescue when the ships start to sink. The government has blood on their hands.
The US will never start stirring conflicts, as the industrial machine will always want more blood, more bombs, more money. This is why we engage in forever wars. Instead of using money to enrich people’s lives and provide services to those in need, we line the pockets of “defense” contractors.
If you want to not show yourself as a bot, you should at least be creative in your racism.
Back in my day we didn’t have these, “bears”.
A bit fascist to assume that the only way to contribute to society is military service.