This is neat, thank you

Article added to https://noailist.org/why-no-ai

The website is using https://textpattern.com/about/ - but I’d like to make the source open, any tips on how I can upload the source to something like codeberg.org would be appreciated, as I havn’t been able to figure out how to do that yet.

This website is really “no AI use at all”, and part of that is to encourage learning, working slowly and carefully. There are ways to obtain similar information without the use of AI, and often times it can lead you to more resourceful information that you can learn from, instead of a ‘quick and easy’ answer just to get the job done.

ml is initials of the rest of my name, ive used the screen name for a very long time

No worries, thanks for the update, due to the reports of AI usage from several piefed users, and due to a lack of an official response, I have moved the entire project to a different better platform that states they are against using AI.

This was very very helpful, thank you, I’ve added all the AI-free alternatives.

Ok, I will try to add that on there, thank you.

Let me know the specifics of your AI free logo, and I’ll see what I can come up with.

Thank you, this is helpful to know.

Thanks for the feedback, the javascript might be part of the Ghost theme. When you said “doesnt work with just the site domain permitted.” - could you please explain this part for me? I might consider moving away from Ghost if it has multiple problems.

I thought about adding projects without asking for permission, but it doesn’t seem right, they might not agree with all the reasons why a project might not use ai listed on the website too.

Thank you, I will get in touch with them.

Companies such as this are welcome to submit / add their info to noailist.org

https://aidirtylist.info/citations/ghost-blogging-platform-promises-job-candidates-access-to-the-latest-ai-tools/

Note: The citation link is listed next to the date info.

Thanks for taking the time to do this, why hide the source link so badly? I did read their page, and it does say the quoted text. Due to this, I will be considering moving away from using Ghost, firstly I will contact Ghost to see what their stance is.

The view citation has no supporting evidence.

I built this partly because I saw nobody else started the project. I’ve only recently myself decided to stop using AI, so its not some kind of capitalization. Sometimes starting a project is the hardest part. It is a brand new project, so there are hardly any listings. In order for a project like this to grow, it needs to be shared on the web, hence this posting. I’d be happy to hear anywhere else I can post it, or any feedback on how to improve the project.

Thank you for your feedback, the reason why is because it was launched today, new categories and projects will be listed as they arrive. So yes, it is brand new.

Sure, ghost may be listed as dirty on that website, but there are no links to actual evidence, despite it being listed as cited, if there are credible citations I would consider building this project away from ghost.