google successfully persuading every usamerican (idk how is in other countries) educational institution that nothing would possibly go wrong if they just slid their useful little software in between teachers and students that everyone could use on their neat little chromebooks was such a fucking catastrophe

im still thinking about this. it is of course fundamentally inconsequential but i do feel that it is substantive evidence that the human mind is not a computer. the specific flavor of wackiness and failure on display here is a treasure which the computational account of mind paradigm fails to capture. people are so cool man

deleted by creator

god yeah he is really cooking here. we are making truly incredible leaps. we are not reading the texts being cited let alone any of the thousands that came after. we are saying with a straight face that saussure discovered the fact that human language maps perfectly onto the perceptron then immediately transitioning into hugging face hack discourse. you may not like it but this is what peak performance of the dialectical science of historical materialism looks like. i didn’t even fucking get to the nick land stuff but i bet it smokes

lol im reading this and this guy seems to really think that he could just muscle his way through the chinese room argument with uhhhhhhh saussure??? boss baby tweet energy but for intro to critical theory

Yet the stubborn fact remains: machines could not do these sorts of things a year ago. However “weak, narrow and crude” such machines were, they are now necessarily less so.

damn dude thats crazy

That’s super interesting because By the by, I’m an SWE who’s run a ML homelab for 10 years at this point.

this is fucking time cube lol

i had to take a lyft when my car broke down the other day and the driver told me that she thought the data centers were for powering the billionaires’ bunkers when the world ends. i thought about this a lot and at the end of the day i decided this is “directionally correct”

I really try not to poke fun at names but those are three of the fakest-sounding names I’ve ever heard in my life

a happy little sycophantic feedback loop

ah yes, the three sexualities

at least smoking is social

ah yes, compassion towards everyone, a thing that people obsessed with IQ definitely evince

it’s so fucking funny that bill gates had basically successfully laundered his reputation from “the demonic sociopath from the antitrust hearings” to “the One Good Billionaire,” but it’s been entirely undone again by the epstein stuff. i bet he does believe the doomer shit because they all do because it’s also like, yeah bill, this’ll definitely be the train that pulls you back into public good graces. definitely

my sense is that AI winter as a term is mainly useful for thinking about, like, academic funding and really basic levels of breathless press coverage and rhetoric. so like after this all blows up maybe people chugging along researching symbolic AI will be in something they could meaningfully call an AI winter again, and it was useful in terms of comparatively analyzing the news rhetoric around this stuff from a couple of years ago, at least before the ascension of madness of doomer-pilled silicon valley rhetoric.

but in terms of raw finances LLMs have occasioned a world-historically overleveraged global economy in a way that so far exceeds “hmm i guess we’re not getting grants like we used to” that for all practical purposes we’re in an entirely new domain. like instead of a balmy ai summer we’ve found ourselves on the surface of venus

i also wonder if this is going to lead to an intramovement schism of some kind, if only because a lot of the activists i’ve noticed turning (or being recruited) towards xrisk shit on the activist level (esp the student activist level) are ex-climate activists. i don’t know if the belief that ai xrisk is the One Risk To Rule Them All has just fully slid into the climate change place in these activists’ minds or if there’s enough lingering reality principle attunement there to give them pause. but i also don’t know enough about the way EA types talk to their activist recruits to know if they’re being allowed into the full “it’s all about the robots” inner sanctum or if the ideologues keep the activists in the sort of “no other existential risks are important too we promise that we believe that 100%” not-yet-clear zone

totally. i also chalk a lot of blame up to the fact that system prompts (I think?) often include language like “you are an AI assistant” and because AI in science fiction is frequently like, a way of alienating and figuring human consciousness by situating it at its limits, it often entails the experience of pain? or like sometimes AI is used to represent what happens when we instrumentalize and objectify experiencing subjects, or experimentally instantiate a real distinction between rationality and feeling, and given that i think most writers believe that these are bad approaches to existence that lead to dysfunction and suffering, well

i think it kind of parallels how so many AI delusional spirals involve New Kinds of Physics – physics is coded as The Smartest Thing Ever and if an AI is Superintelligent or if you’ve unlocked Superintelligence through it then “paradigm shifting innovations in physics” are going to be what follows from that line of reasoning + the “you are an AI” thing

glad to see the sick puppies’s paradigm shifting culture war movement continuing to thrive

not suboptimal management of my home lab…anything but that…