Huh. I’ve played around with D a few years ago… don’t exactly remember his opinions coming to light, but I can’t say I’m surprised either.
Huh. I’ve played around with D a few years ago… don’t exactly remember his opinions coming to light, but I can’t say I’m surprised either.
Google’s extension of RCS does do e2ee, which raises the question of “what happens to security when you talk to a non-Google user”…
It does not. The fingerprint always only unlocks the device’s HSM (“secure enclave” in Apple speak).
Between your devices enrolled in the ecosystem, private keys are synced securely (AFAIK, they make it so that an existing device’s HSM encrypts keys using the pubkey of the new one’s HSM); for signing up using your device on someone else’s computer there’s a process that combines QR codes with Bluetooth communication.
Note that you pretty much can’t store them with Google or Apple; smartphone biometric sensors operate the on-device HSM, not something remote.
IIUC Apple syncs them using the most secure way they can, i.e. when you enroll a new device to your account the existing device, the existing device’s HSM encrypts keys using the pubkey of the new one’s HSM; and for recovery from being left with 0 Apple devices there might be (?) an escrow option that’s optional (?)
The fact that it’s thin and fading outwards makes it looks more like one of the crosshair options in FPS games
There’s no need to access the full file system to download to wherever the user wants. In fact the user might not want to use the local file system, but instead a “cloud” storage provider app!
The Storage Access Framework is built precisely for this.
??? Channels are literally public by definition and viewable even without an account. That’s the whole point of channels. They’re more like blogs than messages.
My next web stack: chota.css, verga.js, poronga.html & pija.php :D
Banning channels is not the same as sharing private data
Why can’t I find any articles about decompiling and researching this one? :(
Sure, I mean, I don’t have any of these though, and I don’t want to deal with even the remote possibility of snail mail arriving From The Internet.
Njalla is bad because you don’t actually own the domain and there have been instances of them shutting down / revoking access?
Haven’t heard of them revoking access for any legitimate users. I like not actually owning the domain because this means not ever seeing a fucking form asking for my literal home address.
Look for used ThinkPads with Ryzen, I bought an L14g2 (5850U+16GB) for about 600 USD and it’s just amazing value
On Firefox Android, adding to home screen is basically just a shortcut to open a very slightly app-ier tab (no browser toolbar, notification to copy the URL). Otherwise it’s equivalent to normal browsing, so yes, your extensions work as usual. (Just checked myself with Tampermonkey).
No, there’s no additional information about your phone, that doesn’t exist.
Oh cool… mm, do we have a GNOME forum on this here threadiverse?
Moved most of my stuff there a while ago, has been pretty great.