The Maryland Democrat said he is “answering the call of the American people” as grassroots progressives and some newly elected senators call for change in leadership.
We need Democratic Leadership that will stand up to the Republicans.
No “Let’s reach across the aisle”, no more “Sternly worded letters”, act like they are trying to kill you, because they are.
In case you forgot, Chris Van Hollen went to the foreign torture prison to assist his constituent.
That required at least some personal bravery.
Van Hollen would certainly be an upgrade, but keep in mind, one of the principal things here is showing voters that change is in the air while they’re still paying attention. Voters voted for change, Demʻs need to show they are serious about it, and theyʻll lock in voters for 2028. Even continue to pretend that Schumer and Jefferies have a place in leadership, and you are litterally creating headwind for 2028, which is like, its practically now. Remember that Presidential cycles start FAR earlier than general cycles. Weʻll literally be in the pre-primary debates/ news cycle in a couple of months.
Iʻm calling Schumer toast. Next to remove is Jefferies. These two have been the real barrier to stopping fascism, along with all centrists and moderates within the party.
Ayanna Pressley for speaker.
https://www.trackaipac.com/tracker/people/member-chris-van-hollen-md-sen-d
I’m frankly surprised that we haven’t heard of a challenger to Jeffries. Just by the numbers it seems more likely one would pop up. I hate to think of the possibility he may be effective in placating even progressive Dems behind closed doors, even if that skill doesn’t extend to actually doing anything.
Ayanna Pressley for speaker.
Has she announced? I figure I’d see a headline. I don’t know her but I’d vote for an overripe banana over Jeffries at this point.
She has not formally yet, but she is doing all of the things one who was going to announce would do.
And honestly, you aren’t going to replace the first black speaker of the house with anyone not of color.
I expect it either first thing tomorrow or first thing Monday
Thanks for the good news!
In this election, the American people called for change. They called for a change from Donald Trump’s disastrous policies — but even bigger than that, a change from the status quo that isn’t working for working people,” Van Hollen said in a statement.
Van Hollen’s move follows attempts by grassroots progressives — and some newly elected Democratic senators — to draft him for the position as some seek an alternative to Schumer.
Younger!
Triangulate Bernie or another progressive and land on Warren. She’s a recognizable name and has at least some morals and ethics.
Even if the dark machine prevails, you can triangulate from Warren to a considerable upgrade.
Van Hollen has openly stated he will block every single penny that goes to the military until the Iran war is over.
He also personally ventured down to the El-Salvador concentration camp to try and find out the status of the immigrants Trump deported down there.
You’re out of your fucking mind if you think he and Schumer are even close to the same thing. Idiots like you are why the left keeps shooting itself in the dick.
I disagree, I like the guy I think he’s promising. Moldy bread would be better than schumer.
I vaguely remember the same buzz around Jeffries. I don’t put a lot of stock in congress. I did my part to vote but now I imagine it’s just going to be 2 years of them doing corpo stuff. Though the joke was more that they’re just two old-ass white dudes that kinda look the same to me.
Picking better Democrats for leadership roles is precisely what will ensure important bills reach the floor for votes rather than having legislative time squandered.
ah don’t mind me. I understand the assignment. It just hurts less if you jokingly expect them to disappoint you. New blood is good.
You might want to read up on the guy a little. He’s pretty solid
Nah, I remember the talk about Jefferies, it was the same as opinions on him now. Centrist corpo lapdog.
Dude who visits his people in foreign prison hellholes is the same and fucking Chuck? Nah.
A senator that doesn’t take money from AIPAC is far and away better.
If you worry about policies, pay attention to who will be chairs of various committees, they will guide what the House and Senate does.
The goal of the majority leader in the Senate and the Speaker in the House is to make sure that Democrats vote together. Bringing bunch of bills and then having Democrats voting against them is exactly something that should be avoided. This be definition means this position shouldn’t be held by someone on one side of spectrum
It requires some skills and also be someone that everyone respects.
I don’t think Schummer has that skill and there are also some questionable actions that he did. I also don’t think we should decide for them, as senators are better aware who they respect and are likely to follow. We should make sure that committees are filled with people with teeth (figuratively as well as literally, heh).
Ok doomer.
Everyone block these shit stirrers and maybe we can keep hope alive enough to actually stay on Democrats’ asses until they get something good done.
Hello, friend!
The people with hope are so cool to watch. I admire their spunk! Lots of, “We’ll win this time!”, and, “AIPAC better watch out!”. I love it!
And if those people with hope maintain that energy and convert it into action beyond simply voting, maybe they will. At least the enthusiasm has the potential to be productive.
