It’s probably nothing sinister, though.
    • Classy@sh.itjust.worksEnglish
      820·
      6 months ago

      Not true, it specifically states in the article that, for example, one user had over 300 photos reappear, “some of which were revealing”. This is obviously not great but it isn’t likely as scandalous as it’s being made out to be.

        • azalty@jlai.luEnglish
          711·
          6 months ago

          It was kinda wrote like a statement. People who didn’t read the article will read it as such, misinforming people

          • Glytch@lemmy.worldEnglish
            62·
            6 months ago

            Since we’re being pedantic: the word you’re looking for is “written” not “wrote”.

            • azalty@jlai.luEnglish
              31·
              6 months ago

              I don’t see where I’ve mentioned a small English mistake. I said that it was written like a statement, which could misinform people

            • azalty@jlai.luEnglish
              34·
              6 months ago

              If misinformation is a minor issue to you, then I can’t do better

            • Classy@sh.itjust.worksEnglish
              57·
              6 months ago

              There’s so much misinformation online, sure it could have been a joke but it’s so easy to just be lazy, read the comment straight and move on acting like there’s some kind of operation going on at Apple stealing your nudes. I don’t really care if it’s a joke or not, and you’re not even the OP so who are you to say it’s for a fact a joke?

              • azalty@jlai.luEnglish
                71·
                6 months ago

                That was the case for me, until I decided to read the article

                • Darkenfolk@dormi.zoneEnglish
                  25·
                  6 months ago

                  What article, it’s just a link. If I can’t read it here it ain’t there.

                  We shouldn’t encourage post-bot behaviour in the posters, title+summary or gtfo.