• silence7@slrpnk.netOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      112
      ·
      5 months ago

      A lot of engineering was done assuming that rainfall behaved the way it did in the past. That’s not a valid assumption anymore.

      • towerful@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        58
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        Those “once in a lifetime” or “once in a decade” weather events seem to be quite common these days

        • Rhaedas@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          34
          ·
          5 months ago

          “Another 100 year flood” seems like a ridiculous headline at this point. Denial is everywhere.

          • Transporter Room 3@startrek.website
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            24
            ·
            5 months ago

            “sure, the forest I played in as a kid is silent, the trees are dying, insects are sparse, we go back and forth between buried in 10ft of snow and heat wave drought inside a month, the river is low enough that it exposed carvings of 1,000 year old famine warnings, but we keep getting flooded every year with once in a lifetime storms, but there’s NO EVIDENCE of climate change and I can prove it because [politician/company] said so”

          • FlihpFlorp@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            5 months ago

            Somewhat off topic but just some trivia from a geology weather class I took

            100 year flood does not mean it happens every 100 years but there’s a 1/100 chance for it to happen annually

            Putting climate change aside for a second for consistency sake, you could go for 150 or 200 years without a 100 year flood or on the other side only a 5 year gap for that 100 year flood if you’re unlucky

            • Rhaedas@fedia.io
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              13
              ·
              5 months ago

              That’s correct, it’s about probability based on past known history. An area could get unlucky and have repeat conditions sooner than normal. When many areas appear to be having this same bad luck, it’s time to reevaluate the probabilities. It’s also why regular weather forecasts haven’t seemed to get things as right as they used to…using the past percent chance probabilities in a changing environment doesn’t hit as well as it used to.

              • FlihpFlorp@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                5 months ago

                Thanks for the input it never crossed my mind that weather (the thing that we can only predict) changes when the past data is no longer relevant

            • Gormadt@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              5 months ago

              And a big problem we’re having is that due to climate change those 1/100 chance events are changing for the worst.

              • FlihpFlorp@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                5 months ago

                Oh 10000% it’s why I said ignoring climate change. Weather events are getting more frequent and more extreme

        • sudo42@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          5 months ago

          seem to be quite common these days

          As well as “once in a lifetime” financial crisis in the US.

      • Rhaedas@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        5 months ago

        At some point even the best plans aren’t going to be enough, and the more we built the worse it gets. When an area gets water amounts in a day that it used to get in a year, that water simply isn’t going anywhere fast. You know how evolution is about adaptation? I don’t think we’re adapting all that well or fast enough. (Yes, it’s not quite the same thing, but the same point. Don’t change, don’t expect to survive)

        • OpenStars@discuss.online
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          14
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          B-b-but climate change isn’t happening? - Republicans then

          B-b-but think of the eCoNoMy!? - Republicans now

          Climate change is happening and we should do something about it! - Bernie Sanders, always

          img

          Where did all these weird weather events come from? - centrists

          • sudo42@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            5 months ago

            If we ever do get the point of starting to actually fix climate change, those same Republicans will be whining that we should keep things the way they are (because by that point the rich will have figured out some way to profit from it).

    • NewNewAccount@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      42
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      5 months ago

      When people talk about the cost of climate change, the updated/improved replacement engineering and construction are some of those costs. And the same exact people who initially denied climate change even existed and who are now downplaying its effects are the exact same people who will complain about the additional costs caused by the consequence of inaction.