OpenAI could be fined up to $150,000 for each piece of infringing content.
  • Vent@lemm.eeEnglish
    56·
    1 year ago

    They didn’t pay the writers though, that’s the whole point

    • lily33@lemm.eeEnglish
      82·
      1 year ago

      True - but I don’t think the goal here is to establish that AI companies must purchase 1 copy of each book they use. Rather, the point seems to be that they should need separate, special permission for AI training.

      • PupBiru@kbin.social
        31·
        1 year ago

        100% this! there are separate licenses for personal listening, public performance, use in another work (movie and TV)… there will likely be a license added for AI training to which some authors will opt into, some will opt out of… it’ll likely start very expensive, nobody will pay, someone will offer up
        old works that aren’t selling well for bargain basement prices, make a killing, then others will see the success and slowly prices will follow and eventually prices will sit at a happy medium where AI companies can tolerate and copyright holders aren’t feeling screwed… well, i mean, they’ll be being screwed but their publishers will be making bank

        that’s my totally out of thin air prediction anyway

      • BURN@lemmy.worldEnglish
        21·
        1 year ago

        I believe this is where it’ll inevitably go. However I’m not sure it’ll be just AI, rather hopefully more protections around individual creative work and how that can be used by corporations for internal or external data collection.

        This really does depend on privacy laws as well and probably data collection, retention and usage too.

      • alias@artemis.camp
        22·
        1 year ago

        That probably depends a lot on definitions of terms of legalese, but there should be a law explicitly for this in every civilised country.