• usernamesAreTricky@lemmy.mlOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 months ago

    Those stories were his aides saying he was considering he might not run again. He never said it publicly.

    Here Harris is directly stating publicly she wants it legal federally. It’s not a new stance for her. As a senator in 2018 she co-sponsored legislation to make it legal federally

      • usernamesAreTricky@lemmy.mlOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        He never explicitly said he would be a one term president or necessarily saw himself as one. I looked back to double check again, and he only made cagey statements about seeing himself as the transition between generations. A two term president could still qualify for that. The more explicit one term stuff was from his aides saying he was considering that

        Should he have just been more direct, yes, but what he said was nothing as explicit as directly stating we need marijuana it to be legalized

        • TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          9
          ·
          3 months ago

          and he only made cagey statements about seeing himself as the transition between generations

          What the fuck else do you think it means to “signal” something in politics?

          • usernamesAreTricky@lemmy.mlOP
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            10
            ·
            edit-2
            3 months ago

            However, unlike that Harris isn’t making a cagey statement here. She’s directly stating that marijuana should be federally legalized

            Really the title of this article shouldn’t be signals

            • TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              11
              ·
              3 months ago

              Thats fair. This is more than a “signal”. What people attributed to Biden (you can dig through the articles of the day; it was very clearly taken as a signal he would remain a 1 term president) was a “signal” though, in the pure sense of it. Its a kind of political maneuver that could be a head fake, could be real, you can figure it out later.

          • TheLowestStone@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            3 months ago

            The Associated Press reported that Biden said in October that he wouldn’t promise to serve just one term but that he wasn’t necessarily committed to running for another four years.

            “I feel good and all I can say is, watch me, you’ll see,” he told the AP at the time. “It doesn’t mean I would run a second term. I’m not going to make that judgment at this moment.”

            You should really read your sources.

          • EatATaco@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            3 months ago

            Holy shit you should be fucking so embarrassed. That link literally says, right in the first line, that it is just “reportedly” it’s not him being quoted. It literally confirms what the other poster said and absolutely contradicts what you said.

            It’s okay to be wrong, but fuck man, you shouldn’t of read at least the first line of your sources to make sure they support your claims when you submit them. That’s just mind numbingly dumb.

          • Cokes@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            3 months ago

            Nowhere in this article Biden says he will Serve only one term. He basically said that it’s an option - nothing more.