Who’s winning POTUS? Will it be called on election night or drawn out? Congress? Etc

  • IninewCrow@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    edit-2
    28 days ago

    Whoever wins … the country will fight about the result for the next four years and completely obscure any reasonable debate or conversation about anything of importance like inflation, wealth inequality, war, the military industrial complex or creeping fascism.

    If America doesn’t get its act together during this election … it’s just taking another step towards becoming a failed state and will break apart within the next decade or two. But it won’t be a war or anything too dramatic … it will just look and sound like a never ending slapfest between shouting children and crying babies who threaten each other but never actually do anything except leave the room with all their toys.

  • Asafum@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    28 days ago

    I’m almost positive Trump wins with how close all the swing states are now and how he’s improving in polling (what the actual fuck people?!) the closer we get to the election.

    I’m also almost positive we will not know for sure on election night as I absolutely expect R controlled states to drag their feet and declare “irregularities” that they need to investigate if they don’t like the way things are going.

    • tyo_ukko@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      28 days ago

      I hope it will not be Florida of 2000 election all over again, but in a massive scale.

      It’s insane, Gore won by several thousand votes, if not tens of thousands.

  • RangerJosie@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    28 days ago

    Everyone worth less than 8 figures will lose.

    Little else will change. Regardless of figurehead.

  • PerogiBoi@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    28 days ago

    Before all ballots are counted, Trump declares himself a winner and starts sounding the alarm about illegitimate counts. Trump then contests battleground states and has enough alternate electors that the final score gets escalated to the Supreme Court, who grants Trump the win while they “figure it all out”. They declare widespread “issues” with the election and localized protests ensue. Trump declares martial law and tells the police to “be tough”. Several injuries and deaths set more riots and protests. Trump orders the national guard to help with crowd control. An overzealous soldier opens with live fire on the crowd, killing several due to stampedes and general chaos.

    Trump blames chaos on Democrats and claims illegal immigrants were behind the violence, begins his mass deportation exercise. Numerous non immigrants are rounded up “as sympathizers” and taken to holding facilities in Texas and several other border states where they are held indefinitely without trial.

    Trump creates a tip line to report “illegal aliens” and people start reporting their neighbours and anyone else they find “suspicious”. People are always keeping their eyes out and keeping their lives to themselves out of fear they may be reported.

    Trump and his regime create a committee to oversee and overhaul elections “due to all that bad corruption” and suggests a moratorium on elections until “they figure it out”.

    They don’t ever figure it out.

  • d0ntpan1c@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    28 days ago

    I’m in a swing state with an abortion measure on the ballot, and while all the polls claim it’s close, I’m not really sure they are properly accounting for the number of voters that have been activated by the possibility of enshrining pro-choice into the state constitution.

    These polling strategies are complex and a lot of thought goes into them, but they rarely can account for uncommon circumstances that increase voter turnout in local or state elections and how that will effect the national election.

    While this is entirely personal reexperience bias, I also wonder how effective these polls are at reaching a representative survey group. I know at least on my phone basically all survey calls and texts go to spam and I wonder if older, more conservative voters are getting overrepresented due to their likelihood of not having those kinds of spam filters in place.

  • Cowbee [he/him]@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    28 days ago

    2016 2: electric boogaloo. Harris loses PA and MI due to campaigning on continued genocide, leaving her with a popular vote victory but electoral college loss.

    That’s what I’d bet on if I were a betting man.

    • latenightnoir@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      28 days ago

      As a non-American, this. And I honestly don’t understand why so many people in our neck of the woods aren’t more concerned about this. You guys are such a heavy hitter from a socio-economical standpoint, that anything which goes down in your country will inevitably affect everyone else.

      • gazter@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        27 days ago

        I have a theory as to why people in my country discuss US politics more than our own. People want to talk about something more ‘important’ than the latest reality talent show, but don’t want to risk talking about local politics. US politics is square in the middle, splashed across our feeds constantly.

        I just can’t wait until elections continue their downward spiral, and presidential candidates need to sing country songs to Snoop Dog so they don’t get voted off the island.

    • Daemon Silverstein@thelemmy.club
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      27 days ago

      As a Brazilian, this too. Also, some PTSD from remembering recent Brazilian elections (sometimes USA and Brazil are so similar that they seem like brothers separated at birth, your Trump was our Bolsonaro, your Biden is our Lula, I wouldn’t be surprised if your Harris is our Dilma without the “stockpiling of wind” thing).

    • Cowbee [he/him]@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      28 days ago

      The material conditions aren’t ripe for a civil war just yet, nor for a revolution. Things have not gotten dire for the US Empire abroad just yet.

    • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      27 days ago

      I don’t know, somebody would have to start shooting back. The only real candidate is the existing military, and I’m not sure they or the Democrats are up for it.

  • P_P@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    28 days ago

    Harris wins comfortably. Lots of lawsuits. Even more violence.

  • ultranaut@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    28 days ago

    Impossible to say but Harris is winning the popular vote for sure. I think however it goes there’s going to be some chaos and violence, I wouldn’t be surprised if there’s blatant attempts by MAGA cultists to sabotage what they can and drag out the vote counting and electoral processes. Its probably going to be a shitshow, and possibly a horrorshow. I don’t expect it to be called on election night unless its a significant and obvious win, which currently seems very unlikely. I would be less surprised if there was a terrorist attack on election night than a clear and obvious conclusion to the election.

    Congress I think Dems are likely to outperform, the RNC is no longer what it was and doesn’t have the ground game they used to. All their money and resources have been sucked into the black hole of Trumps campaign.

    • Zacpod@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      27 days ago

      Well that’s disheartening. Can’t believe that many people prefer a racist con man to a competent woman.

        • abbenm@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          27 days ago

          I wouldn’t rely on them for predictions, but I do think they can be a reasonable proxy for people’s beliefs and/or assumptions. And I would say they at least loosely track the truth…

          NBA betting is not perfectly predictive, but there’s a reason the Celtics are at the top and the Pistons are at the bottom.

        • Dessalines@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          26 days ago

          This page has some background, but historically they’ve always beat polling and any other prediction algorithms as long as they’ve been around.

        • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          27 days ago

          You could keep adding to that.

          People are big mad and think electing a brain-damaged version of Mussolini makes some kind of point.

    • Pandemanium@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      27 days ago

      Wikipedia lists Real Clear Politics as having become more conservative and right leaning in recent years. Their polls may not be as accurate.

      • Dessalines@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        26 days ago

        Gamblers don’t always get it right, but this page has some interesting history: https://electionbettingodds.com/about.html

        Gamblers, polls, and the NYT’s most sophisticated prediction algorithms all got it very wrong in 2016, and severely overestimating hillary and underestimating trump. But of those three, the prediction markets were the least wrong.