Summary

Voters in nine states are deciding whether to enshrine abortion rights in their constitutions, potentially overturning restrictions for millions: Arizona, Florida, Missouri, Nebraska, South Dakota, Colorado, Maryland, Montana, and Nevada.

Key states, including Arizona, Florida, and Missouri, have measures that could challenge current bans, though obstacles remain, such as Florida’s 60% approval threshold.

Support for abortion rights has grown since Roe v. Wade’s reversal, with national attention as Vice President Harris champions reproductive rights while Trump faces scrutiny over his mixed abortion stance.

  • YtA4QCam2A9j7EfTgHrH@infosec.pub
    391·
    4 days ago

    “Mixed abortion stance” is a weird way to say the guy who appointed the theocrats who did away with Roe. He had power before. We know how he used it. Fuck the media for their god damned enabling of this fascist fuck.

    • Apytele@sh.itjust.works
      10·
      4 days ago

      Well its mixed because he still wants to be able to force his mistresses to get them. He just wants the poor to keep reproducing at uncontrollable rates because the best way to have parents not care that you’re having sex with their children is to make sure they have too many to keep track of.

  • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
    15·
    4 days ago

    The motivation, as far as I can tell, has been far more on the side of keeping abortion as legal as possible, which is not good news for Republicans even if Trump wins, because down ballot races will be affected.

    • jaybone@lemmy.world
      4·
      3 days ago

      I’m actually wondering if maybe, just maybe, the republicans shot themselves in the foot here, if this brings a bunch of more women to the polls for this issue alone, then they’ll vote Harris and dem down ballot.

  • bdonvr@thelemmy.club
    10·
    3 days ago

    Florida needs 60% yes to pass, higher than any previous measure got.

    And they got some absolutely fucked description on the ballot (and past a lawsuit)

    The proposed amendment would result in significantly more abortions and fewer live births per year in Florida. The increase in abortions could be even greater if the amendment invalidates laws requiring parental consent before minors undergo abortions and those ensuring only licensed physicians perform abortions. There is also uncertainty about whether the amendment will require the state to subsidize abortions with public funds. Litigation to resolve those and other uncertainties will result in additional costs to the state government and state courts that will negatively impact the state budget. An increase in abortions may negatively affect the growth of state and local revenues over time. Because the fiscal impact of increased abortions on state and local revenues and costs cannot be estimated with precision, the total impact of the proposed amendment is indeterminate. THE FINANCIAL IMPACT OF THIS AMENDMENT CANNOT BE DETERMINED DUE TO AMBIGUITIES AND UNCERTAINTIES SURROUNDING THE AMENDMENT’S IMPACT.