• Saik0@lemmy.saik0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Religion isn’t the need. Social interaction and the feeling of belonging and belief are the needs. Religion can and does fill that for many.

      And before you attack me, I’m atheist.

        • Saik0@lemmy.saik0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          26 minutes ago

          Nobody said it was. Just that it does meet some needs.

          Until you somehow convince those who have those needs that religion isn’t the correct way to meet those needs, you’re not going to get anywhere screaming that religion isn’t necessary. Those people firmly believe it is as it meets those needs for them and don’t have something else to do so.

      • PapaStevesy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        Painting baby toys with lead was pretty popular for awhile, so was filling your house with asbestos. Don’t confuse popularity with necessity, you might get cancer.

        • infinite_ass@leminal.space
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          2 hours ago

          The lead paint and the asbestos both served a need. For colored toys and insulation, specifically. And then we found a better way to serve that need. It isn’t a dumb need.

          Don’t assume that everybody who sees things differently is an idiot.

          • PapaStevesy@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            1 hour ago

            I didn’t call anyone an idiot, I just made the point that something being popular in society doesn’t even make it good for society, much less necessary. Just look at fentanyl, or network primetime television.