TheImpressiveX@lemmy.ml to Movies@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 month agoAccording to the Wall Street Journal, "Wicked" Parts One and Two cost $320 million ($160 million per film). Both parts were shot back-to-back.lemmy.mlexternal-linkmessage-square13fedilinkarrow-up144arrow-down12file-text
arrow-up142arrow-down1external-linkAccording to the Wall Street Journal, "Wicked" Parts One and Two cost $320 million ($160 million per film). Both parts were shot back-to-back.lemmy.mlTheImpressiveX@lemmy.ml to Movies@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 month agomessage-square13fedilinkfile-text
minus-squarexkbx@startrek.websitelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up13arrow-down2·1 month agoMaking films isn’t free, they have to have expenses. What do you want them to do, reduce the spending on the money laundering?
Making films isn’t free, they have to have expenses. What do you want them to do, reduce the spending on the money laundering?