The Gruesome Story of How Neuralink’s Monkeys Actually Died | Elon Musk says no primates died as a result of Neuralink’s implants. A WIRED investigation now reveals the grisly specifics of their de…::Elon Musk says no primates died as a result of Neuralink’s implants. A WIRED investigation now reveals the grisly specifics of their deaths as US authorities have been asked to investigate Musk’s claims.

    • metallic_substance@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I think he 100% believes that he’s just a humble genius trying to change the world. As he receives more and more criticism though, he’s going to use his tremendous power and wealth to lash out because he’s a fragile child. It’s already begun. He will hurt the world with his billions.

  • chemicalprophet@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I had to stop reading. I don’t like progress if this is the cost. I’ll just continue to type out my critical comments with my fingers…

  • brsrklf@jlai.lu
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    1 year ago

    He denied that any of the deaths were “a result of a Neuralink implant”

    Disturbing content ahead, stop there and don’t get too far in the article if you mind that. I know it gave me discomfort.

    One of them scratched its head until it dug out a connector and yanked it out. You know, natural cause of death.

    • jonne@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I guess that’s why he’s trying to get quadriplegics to volunteer for the human trials.

  • porkins@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I get why they do monkey trials, but the part where it said that the one dieing monkey was holding it’s cellmate’s hands really gets to me. There needs to be a better way.

    • Neshura@bookwormstory.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      37
      ·
      1 year ago

      I think the key part here is how every step of the way they just ignored the textbook on how to do this ethically.

      For starters the implant caused bleeding in the female monkey, that should have been caught way earlier by the staff, and the experiment consequently aborted. If you go a step further and extrapolate here you can start to suspect that they didn’t even do the basics and likely skipped non animal testing on the compatibility of the implant with brain matter.

      This reads as if they used animal testing in place of simulated prototyping which is absolutely not how this is supposed to be done. Animal testing is that last step when you’re 98% there already, not if you’re just finished with the prototype.

      We can grow cells in the lab, so what they should have done is test this implant on artificially grown brain matter in the lab, that would have shown them that the implant harm the attached brain without actually harming any living animal.

      • gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah. There are right and wrong ways to do this sort of testing. Taking shortcuts like this so you can “move fast and break things” is categorically the wrong approach in this context, and is unethical and immoral to boot.

  • CarbonatedPastaSauce@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Monstrous. I know he’s a narcissistic sociopath but how do the lab techs, researchers, and veterinarians that worked on this sleep at night?

  • Jimbo@yiffit.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    How could I have possibly run out of articles if I never read your articles Wired… lol

  • Chaotic Entropy@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Sooo… they skipped a lot of stages and just went to torturing disposable monkeys. I can’t imagine any serious ethical review of the project finding that they did anything in line with requirements.

    Like animal testing or not, there are undeniably ways in which it should and should not be performed if it is going to happen.