• lud@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    23
    ·
    1 year ago

    News has never historically been free, only recently through the web and founded by ads.

      • lud@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        11
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Lots of ads

        Edit: also tv news is also a new concept.

          • lud@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Ads have existed for an extremely long time.

            And most news has cost money since forever.

            Tv news is a relatively new development and TV news is entirely founded by ads and as a way to drive viewers to a channel to keep them for other programmes.

          • lud@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            Relatively new compared to news. Either way it doesn’t matter, my point was that it’s funded by ads.

            Tv news also drives viewers to a channel which is probably the main purpose of it.

      • lud@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        14
        ·
        1 year ago

        How much money do you think they would have made if they gave away all their content for free.

        News is pretty expensive.

        • Metal Zealot@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          You mean the world renowned, universally known news agency in America owned by billionaires?

          • lud@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            I am not familiar with who owns who in the USA. I do know that news wouldn’t get made if no one wanted to pay for it.

        • Jerkface@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          I don’t know what is so controversial about this statement. Investigative reporting is fucking expensive. The people who do it need to eat. If you’re not paying for it, who is?

          • lud@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            People in this community can be a bit extreme when it comes to never paying for stuff and the need to justify it.

            I also like piracy but the constant justifications attempts are pretty annoying.

    • Spazsquatch@lemmy.studio
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      True, but just look at how much better it has gotten in the last couple decades. Putting the news behind the paywall runs the risk of ending the battle for impressions and might force nuance into well researched stories.