• darq@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    So, global warming is gonna happen. We no longer have control, it’s not our choice to make.

    You’ve flipped flopped between we don’t need to take drastic action, and no action we can take can help.

    Conveniently, both means you get to ignore arguments to actually do something to mitigate the damage.

    Which really is your entire motivation.

    • Candelestine@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Really I’m arguing a position directly in the middle. Extremely drastic action of the kind that would be effective is no longer feasible. No action is unacceptable, as it would get much, much worse.

      Which is why I’m arguing for some action, but an overall understanding that 1.5 C warming is toast, and 2.0 C might be around the corner, so we need to begin transitioning more attention and resources towards mitigation and reversal. For instance, seas are rising. We probably do have a responsibility to the people that are already being displaced.

      Since we have limited power, we should pursue limited methods of prevention, basically. I think we should not overly pressure India in particular, because it wouldn’t budge Modi, and they’re feasting on cheap Russian fossil fuels. We can and should work towards carbon neutral ourselves, quickly. But we shouldn’t think we can control the rest of the world somehow, and make them do it too. That means things are gonna get hot.