200fifty@awful.systems to SneerClub@awful.systemsEnglish · edit-27 个月前Against truthsamkriss.substack.comexternal-linkmessage-square20linkfedilinkarrow-up126arrow-down11
arrow-up125arrow-down1external-linkAgainst truthsamkriss.substack.com200fifty@awful.systems to SneerClub@awful.systemsEnglish · edit-27 个月前message-square20linkfedilink
minus-squarezogwarg@awful.systemslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·7 个月前Funnily enough it isn’t even required by their purported bayesian doctrine (which proves none of them do the math), you could simply “update forward” again based on the new evidence that the text is part-fictional.
Funnily enough it isn’t even required by their purported bayesian doctrine (which proves none of them do the math), you could simply “update forward” again based on the new evidence that the text is part-fictional.