200fifty@awful.systems to SneerClub@awful.systemsEnglish · 1 year agoAgainst truthsamkriss.substack.comexternal-linkmessage-square20linkfedilinkarrow-up126arrow-down11
arrow-up125arrow-down1external-linkAgainst truthsamkriss.substack.com200fifty@awful.systems to SneerClub@awful.systemsEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square20linkfedilink
minus-squarezogwarg@awful.systemslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·1 year agoFunnily enough it isn’t even required by their purported bayesian doctrine (which proves none of them do the math), you could simply “update forward” again based on the new evidence that the text is part-fictional.
Funnily enough it isn’t even required by their purported bayesian doctrine (which proves none of them do the math), you could simply “update forward” again based on the new evidence that the text is part-fictional.