• TrickDacy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    11 months ago

    I would agree it’s a little worse than it used to be, but the post implies it’s useless which is just false

    • petrol_sniff_king@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      Dude, I switched from Google for the first time in my life a couple months ago because I couldn’t take it anymore.

      Ads, ads, ads, ads, ads, ads, ads
      Ai articles, Ai articles, Ai articles, Ai articles, Ai articles

      The fact that google has a built-in graphing calculator just isn’t worth it.

      I won’t forget this, actually: I was looking up what to do next in a game I was playing—very deliberately, I care a lot about spoilers—and the “people also ask” section implied, for no reason, this had nothing to do with what I wanted to know, that a character who died really early on apparently has things to say in chapter 9.

      • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        Ok. You can’t really avoid spoilers on the Internet though. That’s kind of common knowledge

        • petrol_sniff_king@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          I do. I’m a professional.

          That stupid answers thing only got me once, maybe twice, because I don’t let it anymore.

          This kind of thing is a lot easier to control, though, when your results are what you wanted and not what you didn’t.