• GissaMittJobb@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    New cars, even small ones, have become very expensive, and one reason for that is the mandatory safety equipment that has to be legally sold in the European Union. But the EU wants to change that for city cars, creating a new class of vehicles that will have less safety gear on them, specifically to bring down their acquisition price.

    Brilliant idea to skimp on the fucking security features

  • Kjell@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    3 days ago

    Why wouldn’t the Chinese companies start to produce these E cars? And if the Chinese produces the E car and sell it in Europe, how will it help the local manufacturing? And I’m not sure the estimated 10 - 20 % lower cost will be enough since the car will be very limited.

      • boonhet@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        China subsidises EV manufacturers directly so EU uses tariffs to bring things to a level playing field. Many EU countries have subsidies for EV buyers which is better because that allows you to buy European, Chinese, Japapnese… Whatever you want, all with the same discount.

        • Señor Mono@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          3 days ago

          No secrets there. If the weight of the Chinese government backs your production you can go as cheap as you need it to sting your competitors.

          The next schema is, that Chinese companies produce in the EU. There are some contracts and joint ventures on the way, but all in all the EV market race can simply no be leveled even, no matter the wild and holistic regulatory activism.

  • StinkyFingerItchyBum@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    What I wouldn’t give for a very simple, reliable, non DRM right to repair electric car where you could test, regroup and swap individual cells when they fail.

    No abs. No traction assist. No lane assist etc… No tech beyond heat/AC and a FM radio, cruise control and intermittent wipers.

    Edit: Airbags are cool too.

      • StinkyFingerItchyBum@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        33
        ·
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        Because I know how to drive, well. (Insert soyjack finger pointing here.) I never needed ABS. As an option it’s a great idea because not everyone invests in driving skills. If I could get a cheaper car without it, I would be happy.

        I’m so old and poor, I learned to drive in deep snow, freezing rain and ice way before this tech came out. Front wheel drive, rear wheel drive, stick is all fine by me.

        Great winter tires are way more useful than ABS, but in Canada only Quebec makes winter tires mandatory, and somehow abs is standard?

        Edit: I accept any and all downvotes as admission you can’t drive worth shit. I live in Canada, am an old man and never had an insurance claim despite living as a road warrior for 25 years. Let your downvotes be your admission of lack of skill. :)

        Edit 2: I am laughing, coughing and wheezing really, really hard with all your downvotes. Thanks for the laughs.

        • Kjell@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          18
          ·
          3 days ago

          Remember that you are not alone on the roads. If cars without ABS are being sold some people who can’t drive would get one. Then, during the winter they would cause traffic accidents when they slam the brakes and the wheels lock up.

          • StinkyFingerItchyBum@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            15
            ·
            3 days ago

            Of course. I said it’s a great option. A very good technology, for those without skill. I’d be happy if you could pass a test and skip the cost.

            • Successful_Try543@feddit.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              15
              ·
              3 days ago

              ABS adjusts the brake force individually on each wheel. You cannot do that yourself with just one brake pedal. Thus, ABS will always have a shorter brake distance than manually stutter braking.

              • StinkyFingerItchyBum@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                9
                ·
                edit-2
                3 days ago

                Yes. A good driver doesn’t test those limits. (Except under controlled circumstances.) We drive cautiously according to conditions. If ABS is triggered, you’ve done something wrong.

                • Cherry@piefed.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  10
                  ·
                  3 days ago

                  Unfortunately you are relying on everyone being a good driver to keep you safe. It’s surprising how many people don’t understand simple concepts such as the impact of speed or stopping distances…or choose to ignore the consequences.

        • boonhet@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          3 days ago

          So it’s been proven than ABS can brake much more effectively than threshold braking, which is what most people think of when they say they can brake very well in slippery conditions without ABS.

          I’ve driven plenty without ABS too and not a single time have I been at fault for an accident. But modern ESP systems are essentially black magic for safety because all 4 wheels get braked separately depending on conditions. You’d need to have 4 brake pedals to be able to do what modern cars can do for braking.

          Besides, there’s nobody stopping you from buying a car without ABS for cheaper. I did for my first car. It was manufactured before I was born, had no fancy electronics and was fairly reliable despite the legendarily bad Jetronic injection system. Cost me around 500 euros and it was a beast of an Audi with an inline 5 engine. Excellent engine sound (but stock exhaust so I didn’t wake everyone up at night).

    • Akasazh@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      I agree on almost everything but the abs bit. Like seatbelts and airbags they should not be necessary, could everyone be trusted to drive perfectly.

      But you see, other people that are not, like yourself, perfect drivers do drive in those cars. Hell, they might even drive your car if you’re in a temporary state of not-perfect-driveryness.

      It’s comparable to mouth masks is not about keeping the perfect safe, but to protect the imperfectly healthy (and thereby everybody).

    • Cherry@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      3 days ago

      Has to be made somewhere. Europe could do it but greed and CEO ego ain’t gonna let that happen.