• NewEnglandRedshirt@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    46
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Although you are correct from a historical perspective, you are not from a foreign policy perspective.

    With the dissolution of the USSR in 1991, the United States considered the Russian Federation as the successor state of the USSR.

    Via The US State Department

    • rockSlayer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      33
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      “Successor state” means the next state. Your own source disproved you. The successor states to Yugoslavia are not the same as Yugoslavia in that same manner.

      Edit: since this is the most downvoted comment I’ve posted in this thread, I’m curious. Does anyone know why the US chose to so quickly recognize Russia as the successor state out of all of the former Soviet nations?

      • Wodge@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I dunno, maybe because it’s where the USSR was ruled from, or maybe it’s because it’s the biggest? Or maybe stop being a pedantic little turd and stop the bad faith nonsense and just come out and say you’re a pro putin bootlicker?

        • rockSlayer@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Took a while for someone to finally try and answer this.

          It’s because Gorbachev plotted with a small group of people to undermine the Soviet communist party and “reform” it into a more liberal nation to appease the west. What he failed to realise was that the Soviet communist party was the underpinning of the entire USSR (an optional union), as well as the source of his authority as an elected leader. This intentional shifting of power from “we are party for the politicians” to “we are the party that controls institutions” (as well as external pressure, unorthodox party members as elected officials, and historical implications) weakened the Soviet party and the USSR to the point where unity broke down into national/ethnic tribalism with far right reactionaries destabilizing things even more. When the USSR collapsed in political suicide, Yeltsin was President of the Russian SFSR, was more than eager to seize power from Gorbachev, and was one of three that plotted to illegally dissolve the USSR. The moment the USSR collapsed, Gorbachev was out of power. The US didn’t have to do anything to get the same results as the Mujahideen, but they had a reactionary in power that was lukewarm to the west; the results were the same. That is why they recognized the Russian Federation so quickly.

          The Russian SFSR and the Russian Federation are distinct countries with different economies and different interests. In no way, shape, or form are they the same. The only thing in common is the geographic region. You hurt your credibility by claiming otherwise.