I feel like other streaming platforms will follow the same process as they’ve proven it’s worked.

    • Quokka@quokk.au
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      So clearly some people did pay for that and it was changed at a later date…

          • Whirlybird@aussie.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Absolutely they are. Didn’t say they can’t be.

            What they can’t do however is think that they’re entitled to use the service in ways that are against the terms of service.

            • rikonium@discuss.tchncs.de
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              11 months ago

              Company decides to change the deal and terms of service to require nudes and accompanying driver’s licenses photos every 21 days in this wild hypothetical

              Whirlybird: Why do people think they’re entitled to use a private company’s service nude-free while still paying? It’s in the ToS!

              • Whirlybird@aussie.zone
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                11 months ago

                Whirlybird: unsubscribe if the terms of service are not to your liking

                rikonium: no I demand the other terms of service! Netflix is a human right!