• null@piefed.nullspace.lol
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Now we’re really cooking!

      Okay, so let’s work it out starting really broadly: should everyone in the world have access to post anything they want at all to that Facebook page?

      • SnoopSqueak@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        That isn’t the question. The question is “why can’t the original posters resubmit through the proper channels”? Because it was banned.

          • SnoopSqueak@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 day ago

            No. Remember? They tried that:

            After deleting the original statement, we promptly asked about submitting the post for approval through the proper channels so that it could be reposted. At this point, ODP staff informed us that a meeting with Acton was on the table. After thorough discussion, caucus leadership determined this offer aligned with our goal to bring our message directly to her.

            They got tricked into attending a meeting without Acton. And some of them weren’t allowed into the meeting.

            • null@piefed.nullspace.lol
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 day ago

              You keep using this quote – have you actually read it?

              They asked about submitting the post for approval and they were offered a meeting with Acton.

              That’s what it says.

              You’re making the positive claim that they were told they cannot resubmit the post for approval. That quote does not demonstrate that to be the case.

              Do you understand that yet? Or do we have to loop around again?

              • SnoopSqueak@lemmy.today
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 day ago

                They asked about submitting the post for approval

                …which was ignored. Instead:

                they were offered a meeting with Acton.

                …which turned out to be a lie.

                Where do you get the idea that they were allowed to resubmit the post?

                the Ohio Democratic Party had demanded the criticism be removed. The caucus protested, appealed, but then relented. The criticism never went back up.

                It was banned.

                • null@piefed.nullspace.lol
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  1 day ago

                  which was ignored

                  Does not appear in the quote. If you have another source for that claim, it’s weird that you haven’t shared it by now.

                  Where do you get the idea that they were allowed to resubmit the post?

                  Fair, I’ll rephrase: you cannot demonstrate that they were not allowed to resubmit the post.

                  • SnoopSqueak@lemmy.today
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    1 day ago

                    I do not have a facebook account to see the group page for myself. According to the article, the criticism was not reposted. It was banned there, as reflected by the headline.