ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 21 days agoI think NAMBLA or some other similar org might buy them...lemmy.worldimagemessage-square53linkfedilinkarrow-up1274arrow-down11
arrow-up1273arrow-down1imageI think NAMBLA or some other similar org might buy them...lemmy.worldZILtoid1991@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 21 days agomessage-square53linkfedilink
minus-squareAppoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up8arrow-down1·21 days agoI assume there is no written contract and if, would you be willing to sour the relationship? Definitely leaves a bad taste.
minus-squareNewsteinleo@infosec.publinkfedilinkarrow-up7·20 days agoJust because there was nothing in writing does not mean there was no contract, it just makes it harder to sue.
minus-squarerethnor@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkarrow-up2·18 days agoWritten contacts aren’t the most binding forms. Prior behavior and how other people are treated is more binding. If 10 people sign a contract, and it’s only enforced on one person, the written contact isn’t binding.
minus-squarerethnor@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkarrow-up1·18 days agoFlip the question, would the person that made the name change be willing to sour the relationship? Kind of sound like they are.
I assume there is no written contract and if, would you be willing to sour the relationship?
Definitely leaves a bad taste.
Just because there was nothing in writing does not mean there was no contract, it just makes it harder to sue.
Written contacts aren’t the most binding forms. Prior behavior and how other people are treated is more binding. If 10 people sign a contract, and it’s only enforced on one person, the written contact isn’t binding.
Flip the question, would the person that made the name change be willing to sour the relationship? Kind of sound like they are.