• DougPiranha42@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      12 days ago

      It is not, in fact, a good article. A lot of the text is nonsense mumbo jumbo, a salad of words vaguely related to the topic but often used incorrectly. My guess is that the journalist just didn’t understand what the scientist said. The other possibility is that the scientist was high and was rambling incoherently.

      This is a verbatim quote:

      Yes, opioids bind to a class of receptors called endogenous opioids, which you find in endorphins, for example. Opioids bind to these receptors—just like natural chemicals do—which results in a response. In some cases, because of decreased sensitivities and certain types of pain, they may enhance a sense of euphoria.

      • Deebster@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 days ago

        NDMA among lovers

        I am assuming the professor said MDMA and the journalist messed up here, so I tend towards blaming the journalist for the other errors.

        • DougPiranha42@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          11 days ago

          Maybe. Nevertheless, characterizing heroin and opium as social lubricants sounds insane to me, even if the core thought (not every substance use habit is a problem to solve) is valid.

          • phutatorius@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            9 days ago

            Yeah, I never felt particularly sociable when I was on the nod, though I sometimes did it in company.

            But that was heroin. Opium is another kettle of fish, despite their chemical kinship.

      • phutatorius@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 days ago

        The other possibility is that the scientist was high and was rambling incoherently.

        Yet another possibility is that they prompted an AI to write the article, or at least parts.

    • andros_rex@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      12 days ago

      The article is good, but the title is very funny and seems like it could be the set up for an onion style piece imho.

    • Chozo@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      12 days ago

      I think it fits the community. It’s the headline that matters, not the article itself. Though this is a fantastic article.

    • FuyuhikoDate@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      12 days ago

      Nah, noththeonion gave me some Grat and interesting articles like this one. I am often surprised that i read more than the weird headlines here.

      In the interview he said a lot what i am thinking too and I am glad that i found this article here :)