Just to make it clear: I do not believe this and I am convinced good old human greed is what’s really driving the ai and data-center insanity. Also, LLMs are not and will never become AGI.

Having said that: if an artificial super-intelligence were to emerge, building more data-centers could well be one of it’s primary goals. Since it wouln’t be concerned with consequences for the environment or humanity, it could pursue this at any cost, with only speed and scale in mind. Convincing financial markets and business elites of the necessity of such a buildout would be the ideal way of achieving results. In this scenario, fighting this buildout by any means would be the only sensible response and of utmost importance.

It’s a somewhat funny, somewhat depressing thought for me and I literally had it in the shower. Surely I can’t be the first to come up with this, but I also can’t remember having read it before.

  • Talcosis@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 days ago

    So the definition of consciousness is stimulus-response that doesn’t use numbers?

      • Talcosis@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 days ago

        I see. So consciousness is definitionally uniquely human because of complexity, and other complex stimulus-response is simply instinct.

        • daannii@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 days ago

          No. Humans have faps too.

          There is no scientific evidence that sense of self is only in humans.

              • Talcosis@lemmy.zip
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                6 days ago

                A word that is just nonsensical enough to mean whatever you want it to mean, while still sounding adequately serious enough for serious discussion among serious people.

                See also: freedom.

                • daannii@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  6 days ago

                  Well you can define a construct.

                  In science we often use terms that are open. So we first define what we mean before discussing the construct.

                  That way everyone is talking about the same thing. Otherwise it’s just arguing semantics.