You don’t need accuracy, you need relevance. 25,000 dead people is as relevant as 25,000 dead children.
In the context of the rest of your comments this sentence is mind blowing to me.
You argue about relevance and that the number really doesn’t matter all that much and can’t see why people criticize your argument about transgender people dying being not as relevant as non-transgender people dying?
https://sapa-usa.org/daily-hunger-deaths/
you can’t even get a general statistic right
says nothing about those people being children
Removed by mod
most of them are in African areas that are considered a war zone (Sudan)
And if you want to make a point, you have to have accuracy or your point is shit and it relects on you as being a shitty communicator
Removed by mod
In the context of the rest of your comments this sentence is mind blowing to me.
You argue about relevance and that the number really doesn’t matter all that much and can’t see why people criticize your argument about transgender people dying being not as relevant as non-transgender people dying?
Removed by mod
“25,000 children”
Name one.