Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy said that deliveries of anti-ballistic air defense missiles from allies have fallen threefold compared with 2025, urging partners to accelerate supplies and expand production on Aug. 5.
Maybe y’all should have actually pushed back against the US starting the Iran War harder?
Well, if you want to talk logically about it instead of morally, you’ll not be surprised that Europe, facing the largest land war since WW2 at its doorstep, isn’t very keen on losing the key provider of it’s military deterrence. So, they are forced to keep Trump on board, even if they oppose his actions. Beggars can’t be choosers.
Sure, that might inspire some to resort to ‘gotchas!’, but all that’s showing is those people aren’t interested in actually constructively discussing the problem or even find solutions. So what’s it gonna be?
Btw: aljazeera is a no-no on Middle East topics here.
Btw: aljazeera is a no-no on Middle East topics here.
Ahh so y’all are a bunch of babies that can’t handle reading media from a different biased lens than your biased lens?
Of course Aljazeera is biased but damn that is pathetic…
Show me an example of Aljazeera having heinously distorted coverage of geopolitics from the recent past, especially in the aftermath of launching the Iran War when extensive coverage from different perspectives in the Middle East is as existentially necessary as it has ever been for people to develop a meaningful picture of what is happening… and until then don’t tell me Aljazeera is a “no-no”. Judge the article by its merits, not the url.
Tardigrade, in every discussion I have had with you, you have never acted in a way that felt worth taking the time to respond to you, but here you go in the desperate last attempt to interact with the non-obnoxious form of you.
Thank you. I don’t know how this list of links would answer my question, but you appear to convey the same narrative over and again.
Who should have done what exactly, and when?
@[email protected]
Removed by mod
Well, if you want to talk logically about it instead of morally, you’ll not be surprised that Europe, facing the largest land war since WW2 at its doorstep, isn’t very keen on losing the key provider of it’s military deterrence. So, they are forced to keep Trump on board, even if they oppose his actions. Beggars can’t be choosers.
Sure, that might inspire some to resort to ‘gotchas!’, but all that’s showing is those people aren’t interested in actually constructively discussing the problem or even find solutions. So what’s it gonna be?
Btw: aljazeera is a no-no on Middle East topics here.
Ahh so y’all are a bunch of babies that can’t handle reading media from a different biased lens than your biased lens?
Of course Aljazeera is biased but damn that is pathetic…
Show me an example of Aljazeera having heinously distorted coverage of geopolitics from the recent past, especially in the aftermath of launching the Iran War when extensive coverage from different perspectives in the Middle East is as existentially necessary as it has ever been for people to develop a meaningful picture of what is happening… and until then don’t tell me Aljazeera is a “no-no”. Judge the article by its merits, not the url.
How about you read the rules?
Thank you. I don’t know how this list of links would answer my question, but you appear to convey the same narrative over and again.