I’m writing you from the haze of a 35 degree day (95F) after a muggy night with two hours of sleep. We don’t have any A/C units, but it didn’t help that our fans slowed down and dehumidifier shut off because of the brownouts. Why were there brownouts? Given the heatwave, a lot of homes and businesses had their A/C on full blast and the grid couldn’t handle it. Across the Midwest, the Mississippi Valley, Appalachia, and along much of the East Coast, government agencies issued extreme heat warnings and power grids went down.
Clearly, it’s a sign that global warming is unfolding faster than the major scientific agencies predicted, which also means the overall impacts of the ecological crisis will be worse than they claim.
Hopefully, the implication is just as clear: in North America as in Europe, where a recent heat wave killed thousands, governments do not have the infrastructure to deal with even the early, relatively easy stage of the ecological crisis. And that’s in two of the richest regions on the planet.
We can be even clearer: those in power and those with access to the media and to significant funding have absolutely no feasible plan for getting us through the ecological crisis that they helped cause.
It seems to me like they know exactly what they’re doing and they don’t give a fuck about what happens to us.
If only the aristocratic working class did something instead of just eating the crumbs of the exploitation of the Global South… 😪
They think they have it well because of democracy
Bunch of ******
Nah, global warming is unfolding according to models as predicted by the majority of scientists. Specifically, the “worst case” models that assumed all the feedback loops would continue.
Most of those models were not released for political reasons, and the ones supported by the IPCC were explicitly watered down further to fit more with the desires of fossil fuel interests.
75% faster than worst case. https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2026/08/260801093239.htm
The article you linked claims 75% faster then the previous decade, not models. This fits perfectly with the worst case models, which predicted acceleration.
Yup. I got a first-hand look and even modeled my own when I was getting my degree in wildlife conservation.
Shits fucked, yo.
They do have a plan, but you’re not in it.
Well, there’s a theory but it’s too dark to post here.
In c/anarchism‽
Just post it.
Use spoiler tags if you believe it needs content warnings.My theory, in general, is based on three facts.
1: Climate change is happening and will be devastating. 2: The people in charge know it is happening but are too invested in the causes to stop it. 3: The people in charge, and those with the economic power to make changes happen, do not believe in the intrinsic value of human life, or at least they believe that some human lives are inherently more valuable than others.
Now, there are other reasons for the things happening now to be happening. There’s at least 50 years of history that shows that the right wing and business interests have been quietly taking over, at least in the US, even before climate change became a major talking point. Those are facts that we can just push into the wave of things happening as causing amplification or resonance, not really the core factor right now.
My core belief is that the tech-bro billionaires and some select think-tanks and investment firms are planning for what we can simply call the apocalypse (as driven by climate change) rather than trying to avoid it.
The push for AI is really a push for the surveillance state and data control. They are redesigning the way the internet, communication, and commerce work. The future of computing, in their minds, is cloud-based, with users only getting access to things via a glorified workstation. Information is controlled and given out by AI that tells you what someone said instead of letting you see it. “There is no war in Ba Sing Se” type stuff.
It’s not about making money right now. Right now is the R&D phase. It’s the market-capture phase. Your average user is a beta tester for the infrastructure that will become the new internet.
If you want a good picture of it, you can watch the new Running Man movie. I think it’s a good encapsulation, but it’s still too kind for how bad things will likely get.
Will there be something like the Holocaust? I can’t say. But I can assume that, given the state of the world we are creeping toward, there will need to be a way to dispose of “excess people,” or at least to control those people and use them until they pass. This can be done by war, prison, death camps, or even just plain negligence. If the surveillance state is so complete that you can’t organize and riots are wiped out without even an evening news report, then they don’t matter much.
I think the US is done. There are plenty of stupid people doing whatever they need to do now just to make money, but behind them, just off-screen, are people that I think are working to pick up the pieces after the fall. I could ramble on about that… and China trying to take over the US’s place in global hegemony, but I think it’s more important to focus on the core issue.
Global catastrophe is coming. I know it is more comfortable to believe that our leaders are just greedy idiots. And yeah, some are. Some are even that special kind of stupid where they’re super high-intelligence but low in practicality and empathy.
But the truth is, that somewhere in most of the major nations, there is a report that shows the coming shitshow, and most of them have either realized that things are going to be unavoidably bad or have outright leaned into it.
Nah, am pretty sure this goes into nsfl category. I don’t want to end up hurting anyone
DM it then, I can edit it to reduce unalive language.
I 🫶 readn horror.
i agree but i have a hunch about their plans blowing up in their faces
╮(︶▽︶)╭
Aren’t climate conscious people on the same scale but just at a different point? I think this article is quite reductive purity testing. I welcome people who are progressive who stop eating meat or stop flying airplanes. They’re doing what they can and what they think is possible for them. Don’t shut them out, but draw them in.
I think it’s a fair assessment that at the moment, only states have the necessary power to halt or meaningfully abate the climate crisis, so pressuring them to do so is likely to have more of an immediate effect than organising an anarchist society. It’s not like it’s a realistic goal to have every anarchist in the world totally reorganise society by 2030 and achieve net zero immediately once they’ve done so, so any plan on that timescale needs to account for states still existing.
Society is diverse. Let other people do their part in their own way. Changing consumption patterns can also be very effective, look at the green energy revolution.
Nonono, see if we start walking up those steps someone else is bound to build a door because capitalism. Simple!
