I’m writing you from the haze of a 35 degree day (95F) after a muggy night with two hours of sleep. We don’t have any A/C units, but it didn’t help that our fans slowed down and dehumidifier shut off because of the brownouts. Why were there brownouts? Given the heatwave, a lot of homes and businesses had their A/C on full blast and the grid couldn’t handle it. Across the Midwest, the Mississippi Valley, Appalachia, and along much of the East Coast, government agencies issued extreme heat warnings and power grids went down.
Clearly, it’s a sign that global warming is unfolding faster than the major scientific agencies predicted, which also means the overall impacts of the ecological crisis will be worse than they claim.
Hopefully, the implication is just as clear: in North America as in Europe, where a recent heat wave killed thousands, governments do not have the infrastructure to deal with even the early, relatively easy stage of the ecological crisis. And that’s in two of the richest regions on the planet.
We can be even clearer: those in power and those with access to the media and to significant funding have absolutely no feasible plan for getting us through the ecological crisis that they helped cause.
Nah, global warming is unfolding according to models as predicted by the majority of scientists. Specifically, the “worst case” models that assumed all the feedback loops would continue.
Most of those models were not released for political reasons, and the ones supported by the IPCC were explicitly watered down further to fit more with the desires of fossil fuel interests.
Yup. I got a first-hand look and even modeled my own when I was getting my degree in wildlife conservation.
Shits fucked, yo.
deleted by creator
The article you linked claims 75% faster then the previous decade, not models. This fits perfectly with the worst case models, which predicted acceleration.