• Fmstrat@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    40
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    13 hours ago

    Everyone should read before reacting:

    This is intended to handle the increase of calls that are related to one incident, so callers get automatically routed to an AI agent who asks if they are calling regarding the incident. If the answer is yes, then callers can receive information or updates, and if it’s no, then the callers are transferred to a human.

    This makes sense. A big thing happens that you are aware of. Geolocated calls from that area flood in. An operator, who could be getting useful info, has to handle a flood of “Guess what I just saw!”

    Note that I think they should spend the money on more operators instead, but at least this seems like it has good guardrails.

    • teolan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Except that could be done without AI. Just have a recording that says "we are aware of … taking place near you, are you calling about this ? “, then answer with yes/no.

      No need for bullshit AI.

      • Fmstrat@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        4 hours ago

        My understanding from other articles is caller satisfaction is greater with the TTS system, and it uses voice IVR to triage of they have additional information. AI is not bullshit in and of itself. This product seems barely diffeent from what they provided with APEX.

        Recordings also can’t auto respond with updates to the caller like this can, which is a pretty nice feature, even if it’s just TTS.

        • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 hour ago

          caller satisfaction is greater with the TTS system,

          You know what’s great about the valley callers who don’t make it?

          No bad survey results!

    • Chaf@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      8 hours ago

      You don’t need AI for that. Automated phone answering systems do exist, and can redirect people.

      • Fmstrat@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        4 hours ago

        This is basically a beefed up IVR with better customer satisfaction reports, so… yes.

        But as I said in the other comment, giving updates to callers is something a standard answering system can’t do.

    • Bixcut@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      11 hours ago

      How many operators to handle say 100 calls in 5 minutes? Now imagine the cost to staff a small 911 center to ensure your can handle those calls 24/7. The money doesn’t exist.

      Butts in seats don’t exist right now either. As long as the fancy ivr allows the caller to reach a human with minimal effort, this seems like a scary sounding but neat assistant to a problem without a real solution.

    • percent@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      12 hours ago

      I wish this were pinned at the top. It seems like almost nobody reads beyond the headline.

      • Fmstrat@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 hours ago

        This is one of the few actually cool and useful implementariins to me. It reminds me of my work writing systems to detect antimicrobial issues in hospitals.

        A shame it’s getting so much hate, but they did choose to brand with “AI” so they get what they ask for.