• theparadox@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    2 days ago

    I don’t believe they are suggesting such. The concept of AI as a helpful tool for people trying to complete a task is still valid. Most good work includes repetitive, tedious tasks and AI can potentially automate some of that away.

    I believe the problem is that, first and foremost, we’re attempting to throw all of the world’s knowledge into a black box and power it with all of the worlds resources while praying that it will result in genuine General Superintelligence. Its reckless, destructive, wasteful, and naive.

    Second, most of those in power see it as a replacement for those workers and as an avenue for cost reduction. Middle management that is deluded into believing that they are the reason everything gets done. Narcissistic executives who think their “genius” is the key to their company’s success. If those pesky workers beneath them would just sacrifice literally everything for their bosses and literally obey their boss’s every command, including commands like “just do it faster” everything would be perfect… they believe. The false promises of AI replacing labor gets them rock fucking hard.

    • Rhaedas@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      Wait, you’re suggesting that the higher up on the corporate ladder, the less they understand how the company works?

      I definitely haven’t seen that in my corporation. /s