U.S. President Donald Trump told Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy last year that he had “no cards” in the fight against Russia. But since the meeting, Ukraine has shown it can take the war to Russia.
Russia really doesn’t. You’d think they do but they don’t between grift and fraud they barely have infantry equipment let alone modern air defense missiles. It’s why they keep ending up fielding cold war era equipment.
That doesn’t make sense given that they’ve been steadily advancing. There’s no substitute for munitions, and there’s no hiding their scarcity. Also, the reason armies around the world, including the US and Ukraine, still field Cold War Era equipment is that apocalyptic stockpiles of it were made on both sides so it’s abundant, dirt cheap and largely parts compatible with the equipment that replaced it.
Russia? Steadily has to be a euphemism right? Because it’s several thousand days, tens of billions of dollars and what a million dead over projected estimates. That’s not evidence of incoming victory that’s evidence of attrition and stagnation against a non peer nation.
It’s Manchester United going 0-0 with an incredibly low ranking pre kindergarten team woke chanting about how close it was.
Because it’s several thousand days, tens of billions of dollars and what a million dead over projected estimates.
What estimates?
That’s evidence of attrition
Yes, Russia had been using an attrition strategy for most of this war, using drones and shelling to exhaust their opponent’s reserves of troops and equipment. The reason this has been working is that Russia can field more troops and is producing more equipment.
It’s Manchester United going 0-0 with an incredibly low ranking pre kindergarten team woke chanting about how close it was.
Then you’ll have to forgive my confusion as to how and why the kindergarten team now fully controls one fifth of Man U
Putins comments to reporters said two weeks, the intercepted plans lay out a two week strategy those are estimates.
You get that attrition is the dumbest possible thing to use a strategy when you start a surprise war with an overwhelming disparity of force right? Like choosing the way most wars are lost as a strategy reenforces the fact they’re quagmired.
Again you miss the point, a group of grown men shouldn’t not lose slower they should have already won and handily at that.
he spent more than two hours with Khan discussing the minutiae of Moscow and Islamabad’s bilateral relations. Putin came across as “chilled” during the talks, said a source close to Khan. Afterwards, he invited his guest to stay for an unscheduled, lavish Kremlin lunch. At one point, Khan asked about the elephant in the room: the war that Putin had unleashed a few hours earlier.
“Don’t worry about that,” Putin told him. “It’ll be over in a few weeks.”
It’s intentional, their source is a third party source reporting on a second hand source of a closed meeting that literally cannot be verified because it’s closed door.
Add to that their source is an entertainment network who in court said they are not a news source, that they do not provide news only entertainment.
It’s harassing them with a source only mildly more trustworthy then their own.
Russia really doesn’t. You’d think they do but they don’t between grift and fraud they barely have infantry equipment let alone modern air defense missiles. It’s why they keep ending up fielding cold war era equipment.
That doesn’t make sense given that they’ve been steadily advancing. There’s no substitute for munitions, and there’s no hiding their scarcity. Also, the reason armies around the world, including the US and Ukraine, still field Cold War Era equipment is that apocalyptic stockpiles of it were made on both sides so it’s abundant, dirt cheap and largely parts compatible with the equipment that replaced it.
Russia? Steadily has to be a euphemism right? Because it’s several thousand days, tens of billions of dollars and what a million dead over projected estimates. That’s not evidence of incoming victory that’s evidence of attrition and stagnation against a non peer nation.
It’s Manchester United going 0-0 with an incredibly low ranking pre kindergarten team woke chanting about how close it was.
No, steadily is the word.
What estimates?
Yes, Russia had been using an attrition strategy for most of this war, using drones and shelling to exhaust their opponent’s reserves of troops and equipment. The reason this has been working is that Russia can field more troops and is producing more equipment.
Then you’ll have to forgive my confusion as to how and why the kindergarten team now fully controls one fifth of Man U
Putins comments to reporters said two weeks, the intercepted plans lay out a two week strategy those are estimates.
You get that attrition is the dumbest possible thing to use a strategy when you start a surprise war with an overwhelming disparity of force right? Like choosing the way most wars are lost as a strategy reenforces the fact they’re quagmired.
Again you miss the point, a group of grown men shouldn’t not lose slower they should have already won and handily at that.
provide a source for Putin saying that to reporters dumbo
Oh you’re hilarious.
we’re still waiting for a direct source dumbo
https://www.theguardian.com/world/ng-interactive/2026/feb/20/a-war-foretold-cia-mi6-putin-ukraine-plans-russia
This is literally someone told that someone else told them something that the third person say to the other person…
This is only trustworthy because you trust The Guardian.
It’s intentional, their source is a third party source reporting on a second hand source of a closed meeting that literally cannot be verified because it’s closed door.
Add to that their source is an entertainment network who in court said they are not a news source, that they do not provide news only entertainment.
It’s harassing them with a source only mildly more trustworthy then their own.
Oh so your source is trust me bro. Here, I can do that too. Here’s a source confirming that you regularly shit your pants in public.
I gave a source genius.
Which time, he says a few weeks at the start and he’s said it’s coming to a close about as often as trump says Iran has been defeated.
It’s amazing how you’re too dumb understand what it means to provide a direct source.
That’s a fun non answer, so again. Which time.