return2ozma@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 4 days agoAI agents meant to replace Meta workers made “large-scale, disruptive actions”arstechnica.comexternal-linkmessage-square25linkfedilinkarrow-up1161arrow-down13cross-posted to: [email protected]
arrow-up1158arrow-down1external-linkAI agents meant to replace Meta workers made “large-scale, disruptive actions”arstechnica.comreturn2ozma@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 4 days agomessage-square25linkfedilinkcross-posted to: [email protected]
minus-squarejumping redditor [they/them]@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·4 days agothe only problem I see with that theory is that the employee count reduction might let them go below legal limits requiring more bullshit making it cheaper to pay more for Ai than the people it replaced because you have less regulatory nonsense.
minus-squareh0tbeef@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·2 days agoBeing below a certain employee count reduces worker protections It does not change the cost of the slop (which is currently artificially tiny)
minus-squarejumping redditor [they/them]@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·2 days agodo some of those protections not involve expensive machinery (like sawstop saws)?
minus-squareh0tbeef@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 days agoWouldn’t something like that be machinery the saw company already owns? Does slop not involve expensive machinery?
minus-squarejumping redditor [they/them]@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0arrow-down1·2 days agomostly thinking if you could shave off the administrative employees (like finance and marketing) you could fall below the limit)
minus-squareh0tbeef@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 days agoThe limit for what? The bottom line is that AI is both more expensive and less productive than humans for at least 99% of tasks
the only problem I see with that theory is that the employee count reduction might let them go below legal limits requiring more bullshit making it cheaper to pay more for Ai than the people it replaced because you have less regulatory nonsense.
Being below a certain employee count reduces worker protections
It does not change the cost of the slop (which is currently artificially tiny)
do some of those protections not involve expensive machinery (like sawstop saws)?
Wouldn’t something like that be machinery the saw company already owns?
Does slop not involve expensive machinery?
mostly thinking if you could shave off the administrative employees (like finance and marketing) you could fall below the limit)
The limit for what?
The bottom line is that AI is both more expensive and less productive than humans for at least 99% of tasks