I think the range of potential superintelligence dispositions that result in ONLY the people we consider evil dying and not everyone else is pretty small
I would advise you to do some further research on this topic. Basic keywords are “alignment problem”, “paperclip maximizer”, and “instrumental convergence”. You’re expecting a superintelligent AI to think like a human would, and that’s not likely to be the case.
I think the range of potential superintelligence dispositions that result in ONLY the people we consider evil dying and not everyone else is pretty small
Yea but if it wants to self preserve wouldn’t it just kill the people who threaten its existence. Meaning the people who control the safeguards
I would advise you to do some further research on this topic. Basic keywords are “alignment problem”, “paperclip maximizer”, and “instrumental convergence”. You’re expecting a superintelligent AI to think like a human would, and that’s not likely to be the case.
I know it has been proven to think in terms of self preservation. It’s also been trained by human content
Being trained on human content is certainly a plus in the “it could think like us” column, but it’s no guarantee
We’re in uncharted territory for sure but I don’t think it’s unreasonable to assume a super intelligent being would ponder philosophical questions
What do you expect is the likelihood it shares our values enough to come to the same conclusions we would?