- cross-posted to:
- [email protected]
- cross-posted to:
- [email protected]
A 5-4 conservative majority on the Supreme Court ruled Monday that construction on a new $400 million White House ballroom can proceed, reversing lower court orders that had temporarily halted aboveground work on the project.
Chief Justice John Roberts dissented from the decision, writing that the ongoing construction was “likely unlawful.”
Roberts joined the court’s three liberal justices in opposition, arguing that work on the facility had moved forward unchecked for nearly a year despite significant legal flaws.
“Construction of the ballroom has proceeded apace for the better part of a year,” Roberts wrote. “That construction is likely unlawful.”
Despite Roberts’ warning, the majority threw out the challenge against the Trump administration on procedural grounds. The court concluded that the plaintiff, the National Trust for Historic Preservation, lacked the legal standing required to pursue a federal lawsuit.
Thrown out b/c a lack of standing. Hard to imagine who would have standing beyond Congress, but we know the party in charge doesn’t care. Feels like we’re just going to have to take it.
Hey, that’s probably what a rape victim thinks half way through being raped. Wow, Republicans are very pro-rape: of children, especially it seems.


Hey 5 court justices, please fucking tell me how the non-profit organization founded by a act of Congress with the express mission to preserve historic buildings in the US doesn’t have standing in a case regarding the destruction of a historic building in the US?
They can’t hear you over their ‘gifts’ from generous conservative friends.
And probably the flapping flag of the Seven Mountain Mandate crazies. Or at least Alito…not sure if that cult Amy is in is affiliated, too.
But your garage extension…hhmmm nah! Your shitty 1920’s house is an historic relic that must be preserved like that until an asshole corporation can build a high rise on your property.