Wow, you went way out of your way to come up with a completely different understanding of what I said.
You were the only one who has tried to compare the method of removal, I’m still talking about the act of removing.
I’ll type it slower this time so you really get it: people shouldn’t be able to be removed from the places they’ve lived for most or all of their lives. Regardless of where that is or who’s removing them. It doesn’t matter what the reasons or method are it always results in pain and suffering.
Seriously, stop trying to act like you changing the subject is me changing the subject or me reiterating my point multiple different ways it somehow me not saying the same thing over and over and over and over and over again.
Wow, you went way out of your way to come up with a completely different understanding of what I said.
You were the only one who has tried to compare the method of removal, I’m still talking about the act of removing.
I’ll type it slower this time so you really get it: people shouldn’t be able to be removed from the places they’ve lived for most or all of their lives. Regardless of where that is or who’s removing them. It doesn’t matter what the reasons or method are it always results in pain and suffering.
Seriously, stop trying to act like you changing the subject is me changing the subject or me reiterating my point multiple different ways it somehow me not saying the same thing over and over and over and over and over again.
FYI, I never disagreed with you on the morality of it to begin with. In fact, that’s why I didn’t address that point: I had no objections to it.
Now, seriously, for the last fucking time, knock it off with your needlessly combative attitude! You’re the only one here acting in bad faith!
You were the first one to use italics, I take strong issue with the idea that I was the first one to be needlessly combative.