• alapakala@quokk.auEnglish
    74·
    4 hours ago
    1. I am not OP
    2. but a Black anarchist vanguard. (Since you are on lemmy, so you can’t see my «Politics» label)
    3. I sat down to review all your historical assertions without a single citation (meaning, I won’t cite back if you don’t)
    4. Are there Achtundvierziger today, or similar vanguard parties? @[email protected] maybe projecting the trends a sees from camp threadiverse comments & posts, but do we even have a contemporary vanguard party doing praxis?
    5. PSL legitimately doesn’t count, so if you bring them as an example, we have nothing further to discuss.
    6. Could Godric have your permission to cite you instances of what a sees is campist rhetorizing moving forward, so you hold them accountable? I believe all of us🧵 want to end campism. I in particularly need to see Dengism邓理论 gone forever. I am NOT asking permission for myself, or that of Dengist reprimands. But if you can work with Godric here to hold campist rhetorics from at the least .ml when you see it.
    7. I am on this instance exactly because I have given up on 习 bootlicks. So honestly don’t bring it up.
    8. Any additional questions?
    • SpookyBogMonster@lemmy.mlEnglish
      73·
      4 hours ago

      Any additional questions?

      Yeah, what in the ever living fuck are you talking about? This AI listicle-ass comment is genuinely illegible to me. I don’t understand what you’re trying to say

        • Tomorrow_Farewell@lemmy.ml
          21·
          2 hours ago

          The ordered list in that comment serves no purpose, as the items are not even properly grouped. It just hurts readability.

          • alapakala@quokk.auEnglish
            21·
            2 hours ago

            They are grouped by topics 1 respondent, 2 politics, 3 literacy confirmation, 4 thesis, 5 warning, 6 intersection check, 7 commentary, 8 openness to dialogue

            • Tomorrow_Farewell@lemmy.ml
              2·
              1 hour ago

              So, at the very least:

              • 1 and 2 pertain to the same topic. 2 even continues the same sentence.
              • 4 and 5 should be grouped together, as 5 refers to 4.
              • 6 and 7 should be grouped together. In part because they both are just regurgitation of propaganda made by y the same people that sold you on Nayirah’s testimony, Iraq WMDs and the like. (Also, have to chuckle at the “campism” but when you very openly engage in pro-NATO campism.)
              • Just using standard paragraphs and not an ordered list would be more readable, since you are not enumerating anything, nor is there a good case for referring to each of these items by the numbers outside of the conversation about how useless the ordered list is here.