Have a sneer percolating in your system but not enough time/energy to make a whole post about it? Go forth and be mid — welcome to the Stubsack, your first port of call for learning fresh Awful you’ll near-instantly regret.

Any awful.systems sub may be subsneered in this subthread, techtakes or no.

If your sneer seems higher quality than you thought, feel free to cut’n’paste it into its own post — there’s no quota for posting and the bar really isn’t that high.

The post Xitter web has spawned so many “esoteric” right wing freaks, but there’s no appropriate sneer-space for them. I’m talking redscare-ish, reality challenged “culture critics” who write about everything but understand nothing. I’m talking about reply-guys who make the same 6 tweets about the same 3 subjects. They’re inescapable at this point, yet I don’t see them mocked (as much as they should be)

Like, there was one dude a while back who insisted that women couldn’t be surgeons because they didn’t believe in the moon or in stars? I think each and every one of these guys is uniquely fucked up and if I can’t escape them, I would love to sneer at them.

(Credit and/or blame to David Gerard for starting this.)

  • fullsquare@awful.systems
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    2 days ago

    arguably it’s stupider than that

    and this doesn’t even go into whether pallet of lean spaghetti is in any way insightful, or does it explain anything, or does any of these things manmade proofs do

    • schnoopy@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      2 days ago

      You’ll forgive me, I’m neither lobotmised nor a mathematician.

      The poster wants to slop into existance a language for stacking logical statements on top of each other and testing/prooving truthiness but the statements are what? Physics rules?

      And once you have this um magic world simulator from first principles (since it would have to be, because the thing about science is we need to do the experiments since we don’t know how things work fully) it will somehow stumble onto RTPSC materials?

      K

      • fullsquare@awful.systems
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        2 days ago

        i’ll also note that assembly of reply guys decided that room temperature superconductors will magically solve energy requirements of silicon-based chips (this is not how any of this works)

        • rhamph@awful.systems
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          Once we have superconductors, all computation will immediately switch to relay-based logic

          • fullsquare@awful.systems
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 day ago

            cmos logic still beats it, because main source of heat are switching losses (all these gate + parasitic capacitances being charged and discharged, and some related phenomena). relays store more energy, and that makes situation worse, even if you make them as MEMS

          • fullsquare@awful.systems
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            22 hours ago

            incidentally, this is also their current best shot at turning rube goldberg cash burn pit into something that’s not one

        • BioMan@awful.systems
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          1 day ago

          Good God. Sometimes I wonder how small the population that understands all these references and knows all this deep lore and history is. How few people really understand the true nature of this bunch of people and how their ideas have ruined so much. When I go to conferences I get to have 4 hour conversations over beer with astrobiologists explaining how ideas from a blog in 2009 started showing up uncited in their literature 8 years later (when late undergrads who read a blog post start writing papers during their PhDs) and have since completely fucked whole subfields. They are flabbergasted at first, but then they see it, and see the damage done. So few people actually see this.

          • blakestacey@awful.systemsOP
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            edit-2
            1 day ago

            In the TESCREAL lore iceberg, “Aella Sankey chart” is above the waterline.

            • Existence of HPMoR
            • Existence of Zizians
            • Aella Sankey chart
            • Aella not showering

            • Topher Brennan leaks Siskind emails

            • “AI datacenter water usage is fine actually” Substack

            • Cremieux’s alleged old Reddit handle

            • Scott Aaronson anti-feminist breakdown
            • Scott Aaronson goes full Zionist

            • Glowfic

            • su3su2u1 review of HPMoR

            • Robot God deduces general relativity in three frames with the power of Bayes

            • Scott Aaronson makes airport cops sympathetic

            • TracingWoodgrains attempted hatchet job against David Gerard

            • Eliezer Yudkowsky is That Guy when recommending scifi books
            • rhamph@awful.systems
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              1 day ago

              TracingWoodgrains attempted hatchet job against David Gerard

              Out in the wild, I’ve actually seen somebody cite that piece earnestly… as an example of how Wikipedia still has problems even if it’s generally a useful source of information.

              It’s like praising with faint damnation.

            • fullsquare@awful.systems
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              1 day ago

              where does thiel/paypal mafia funding situation, urbit, other fashware and broader reactionary connection (yarvin etc) fit into that

              also, that one oral bacteria startup

            • nfultz@awful.systems
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              1 day ago

              su3su2u1 review of HPMoR

              obi-wan-theres-a-name.png

              what ever happened to them anyway? Probably has tenure by now, hopefully?

              • BioMan@awful.systems
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 day ago

                As someone who has started guarding their internet anonymity jealously after a series of VERY weird events (which fortunately do not involve our ‘friends’) I remember this incident soooo much…

              • blakestacey@awful.systemsOP
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 day ago

                Somewhere in the review, they mention having left academia for industry. Hopefully that worked out well for them.

            • schnoopy@awful.systems
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              1 day ago

              Aella Sankey chart

              I’m really being tested on my liberation and sex positive values here. Gosh that’s a very weird and kinda gross thing to do.

              What motivates someone to chart their fetish fulfillment?

              Well whatever. I hope people had fun, seems like it must have been very scheduled and regimented though…

          • schnoopy@awful.systems
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            1 day ago

            It was kinda wild studying physics while this was starting.

            People were getting all these starry-eyed ideas while anyone actually doing well was realising that the future is going to look a lot like the present because god hates us and we’re not allowed nice things.

            • BioMan@awful.systems
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              edit-2
              1 day ago

              It helped that the first person I explained this to at a conference was explicitly working on deconstructing models of the origin of complex life that imply that it’s slow and unlikely that have been uncritically accepted in a lot of circles without actual evidence, and he was already confused about why following the chain of citations bottomed out at weird economist named Robin Hanson and why his naive model was ever taken seriously… oh MAN we had a fun evening.

              Amusingly enough, something much like this has happened to me twice two years apart. The scientists deconstructing this stuff are always the most interesting people too.

              • fullsquare@awful.systems
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                6
                ·
                24 hours ago

                “there is a global far right conspiracy that attempts to reinvent alchemy, colonize space and build a machine god, which they intend to use to enslave everyone else. it’s informed by misreading of old scifi and racism, but it only took off after certain hp fanfic was written. currently it’s commanded by a californian polycule with a drug problem, but also counts in their ranks white house officials, and possibly some from russian government”

                unfortunately this does not make a great conversation starter. whaat? a cult took over an entire government of south korea? this could never happen here

                • BioMan@awful.systems
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  6
                  ·
                  23 hours ago

                  You’d be surprised. The usual icebreaker is the topic of the deep-seated unstated assumptions that people have in their mind when the construct models of evolutionary history, the future of Earth’s biosphere, and the place of biology in the universe. I am lucky enough to run in the circles with astrobiologists, evolutionary biologists interested in the evolution of complex life, and abiogenesis types, who tend to appreciate the deep importance of unstated assumptions. It is very easy to point out a set of unstated assumptions that have poisoned areas of science near them… which always points back to the god damned singulatarians because when you assume the future is Humanity’s Grand Destiny Among The Stars OR BUST, it severely constrains your notions of what is possible in a universe that looks like ours and inevitably mutilates the study of the topics they/we run in.

    • istewart@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 days ago

      just like our favorite TV show, right? surely a comprehensive description language for physics can’t be THAT much more complex than a steaming hot cup of Earl Grey tea!