“At the end of the day, there was so much doubt,” the woman said. “The prosecution didn’t have a figurative smoking gun. There was not a single moment throughout the presentation of that case where you could say ‘Yup, 100% I’m certain she did it’ or that she didn’t do it. There was too much gray area.”
There is no question that she strangled them. The court is trying to determine whether she was sufficiently sane at the time to be held culpable.
Not according to one of the jurors:
https://www.cbsnews.com/boston/news/lindsay-clancy-juror-interview/
Couple that with the the sketchy findings about the husband’s actions and wearabouts, there is indeed question and reasonable doubt.