President Trump got in the face of ABC’s Rachel Scott after she asked him a question about the rationale behind his national midterm voter bribe.

“Mr. President, on the checks: The U.S. is still $40 trillion in debt. If your economic policies are working, why do you need an incentive for people to turn out to vote?” she asked Thursday night.

  • bedwyr@piefed.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    1 day ago

    Anyone have the actual video? The link does not, and a 5 minute startpage search didn’t find it either, god search engines suck now.

          • Eldritch@piefed.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 day ago

            I’d say how it was supposed to work vs how its actually worked. One is a work of fiction on the level of twilight, the other is historically important. Capitalism can’t control or regulate itself. Not as long as people are in control.

              • Eldritch@piefed.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                6 hours ago

                Your reply is a bit puzzling. Were you intending to reply to someone else. Because you’re just agreeing with me?

            • Optional@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 day ago

              It can, but it doesn’t. Whether that’s because people-are-evil or not is a different discussion. Strong regulation, judiciously applied, makes a fair market better.

              Of course money is the root of all evil, but then we like stuff.

              • Eldritch@piefed.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 day ago

                No disrespect. If it “can” when did it ever? If never, then can it really?

                The one and only time we ever came close in the United States was around the new deal. But that was forced on the capitalist. And they spent the next hundred years dismantling it again.

                • Optional@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  1 day ago

                  The 70s had some good progrss in several areas. Conservative/republican/fascist assholes focused on media right after that and that’s why it’s all been going to shit, but if we could shake off this fascist cult and elect a decent government they could get back on track.

                  • Eldritch@piefed.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    1 day ago

                    This isn’t a republican / Democrat thing. In fact if the government is involved it’s not an instance. If it’s not capitalists regulating themselves and making themselves more competitive and less shitty. It doesn’t count.

                    And it’s easy to understand why this wouldn’t work. Also why we had so much legislation against price fixing which is no longer enforced. Put it this way. The base mechanism on how capitalism is supposed to be self-regulating and improving. Is competition. But if you and your competitors actually compete. Your profit margins will always be minimal. Almost nonexistent. However if you and your competitors agree not to compete. You can simply multiply your margins by many times with no extra effort. Thus outside government pressure you have a fiduciary duty to the business owners not to compete. Competition is only in the consumers favor. Never the business owner.

    • arrow74@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 day ago

      The link does have the video you just have to scroll. They made it very small as well, but it’s there.

      I wouldn’t call it a lunge and that seems to be clickbait. He got closer and leaned in to tell a reporter to shut up basically.

      What I found interesting is how much his speech is slurring and how slowly he’s moving in general.

      • bedwyr@piefed.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 day ago

        Indeed honestly it wasn’t a lunge. Just another misogynistic disrespect of another female reporter. He really doesn’t like woman questioning him.

        His health is getting bad, I’ve seen hm decline since after 2020, he’s a shell of the man he was then. He fell asleep, what is it now, 34 times or something at official events on camera this term so far? He has no internal filter left, openly admitting to patheticly giving himself awards and such.

      • bedwyr@piefed.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 day ago

        Ah thanks!

        He really does have a thing with woman questioning or criticizing him, or blacks. He’s so much worse this term too.