• LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    Oh that sounds like a nightmare to make it work and not limit the creation of most new works. This is the first time I’ve heard about that.

    Shit people like Patrick Rothfuss wrote himself into a corner in only a couple books, attaching series is asking for stumps. Just let works be free and seperate

    • Zorque@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      If building a world limits your options, you’re really not doing it correctly.

      • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        Its not building a world, it’s merging several worlds and then saying the physics all match up and the magic only works in one way or another while not working in other areas. Dudes got like 80 books or some shit. Unless he was really just using the same stuff over and over which would get tired by the second or third series, I just don’t see how it would blend well.

        • kionay@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 day ago

          if you read them you’ll see that they do blend well

          it sounds like you won’t, but I have read everything published and the numerous magic systems all feel very unique, but are based on a very sound central logic

          one of his foundational tenets in writing magic systems is something like exploring the limits of a magic system before you expand it, and he absolutely does that

          mistborn’s second trilogy is a perfect example of that, there’s not new magic, or at least not much of it, but a remixing of what was in the first trilogy and all of the implications of that remixing was more than enough for the second trilogy