Is it really necessary to send humans to those places just to get the knock-on benefits? Couldn’t we do those things directly, without going there?

It seems to me that, today, those who have the money to spend on these endeavors would only do so if there were perceived short-term benefits to themselves. That means they plan to exploit the resources, or increase their own power somehow.

I know the good engineers that make this happen are doing it for the challenge and in the pursuit of knowledge, and I know that’s why we poors support it, but that doesn’t “pay the bills.” What is the motivation behind the money? Why are they really doing this?

  • skibidi@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    This just pushes the question up a level. Why explore space? All the things we need, all the things we like, all the problems to solve - they are here.

      • skibidi@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 days ago

        My answer would be that it isn’t.

        There’s nothing inherently noble in exploration. It is, in fact, a conspicuous luxury in a world where needless suffering abounds.

          • skibidi@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            4 days ago

            We are capable of what we do. If the system can’t produce an outcome, then it isn’t capable of it.

            Consider why those in power would be willing to spend resources planting flags in space, but unwilling to feed the hungry or tend the sick.

            • kieron115@startrek.website
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              4 days ago

              I just mean resource and manpower wise we have the requirements to handle both. I understand that the system is the failure point right now.