Noting the charge levied in another comment on this, I’d amend to 5 people with a minimum of two bottoms.
A group of 5 people with 4 tops and 1 bottom probably changes the classification to a gangbang. 1 top and 4 bottoms, a reverse gangbang (and likely tricky to pull off). 2 tops and 3 bottoms, or 3 tops and 2 bottoms, would seem to form the minimum unit to be classified as an orgy. However, further study is needed.
I suppose now the question is what’s the minimum number of people to classify it as an orgy. 5 is my best guess.
That sounds right. I’ve heard of a threesome. I’ve heard of a foursome. Never heard of a fivesome. Because that’s when it becomes and orgy.
But what about if it’s a gangbang instead?
So an orgy would need to have 5 people with either 3 genders or at least people of 2 genders.
Noting the charge levied in another comment on this, I’d amend to 5 people with a minimum of two bottoms.
A group of 5 people with 4 tops and 1 bottom probably changes the classification to a gangbang. 1 top and 4 bottoms, a reverse gangbang (and likely tricky to pull off). 2 tops and 3 bottoms, or 3 tops and 2 bottoms, would seem to form the minimum unit to be classified as an orgy. However, further study is needed.
LGTM
I think we have a scientific definition now
I’d prefer 5 separate genders at my origies, we have the technology
That’s homophobic…
Yeah, cracks in the wall found an issue as well. His proposed minimums of 2 tops, 2 bottoms and 5 people is better.