AI companies announce they will self-regulate because of their moral obligations
Here we go - they’re going to make open models and self hosting illegal and then demand we only get AI from approved American corporations. What a joke.
Make sure your models are downloaded now folks. Nvidia owns huggingface now
Meh, it’s not hard for Chinese companies to create a website
🎶🎵 Just Follow the Moneeeyyy… 🎵🎶🎵
President Pedophile of the Unites States <sic>
Greg Brockman’s signature looks like a five year old’s as well.
A rapist pedophile mass murderer has no morals.
End of fucking story.
Almost like the Constitution, in that Trump and his cronies will ignore it.
“And the president said he plans to name an “AI czar” in the next three or four days.”
It’s probably going to be fucking Kid Rock or some other unqualified Trump simping cronie.
My money’s on Musk getting the job, because that would be the worst possible choice.
Whenever did any kind of voluntary regulations in industry and commerce actually benefit the people?
Oligarchs are people too!
they surely are people-shaped, not much more in common with common people though
ESRB maybe? Yeah that’s about all I’m coming up with.
The European Systematic Risk Board? They are part of the European Central Bank. Not much of self-regulating here.
Entertainment Software Rating Board, basically US Pegi.
Ah, OK. That kind is not much regulating, actually. Or have you heard of them demanding serious penalties from someone?
Nah they basically do their thing and nobody thinks about them anymore. They popped up as an industry reaction to people calling for censorship regulations, I think the last time they had any major problems was around 2013 when GTA V released and dumbasses being stupid about that and trying to push an adult rating.
A constitution for the rich/Epstein class.
it will be great the CEO’s said “winning” and Trump said they can police each other
Voluntary standards can be a useful starting point, but they need teeth to be more than a press release: public reporting, incident disclosure, third-party audits, and consequences for quietly dropping the commitments. Calling it a constitution raises the bar; constitutions are meaningful because institutions can enforce them.
constitutions are meaningful because institutions can enforce them.
Throughout trumps term… that’s sounding less and less to be the case.
Maybe that’s the idea, they aren’t trying to raise the bar out of what we expect from this pinky swear. Maybe they want us to lower our expectations of a constitution to be “guidelines that we sometimes follow, when they don’t get too much in the way of what we want to do”.
Maybe they want us to lower our expectations of a constitution to be “guidelines that we sometimes follow, when they don’t get too much in the way of what we want to do”.
Ding ding ding
Calling it a constitution raises the bar
No. Calling it a constitution low key reinforces this administration’s contempt for the US Constitution. By suggesting it’s just a “moral framework”
deleted by creator
If there’s anything actionable about it, it would be collusion to crack down on any Chinese, local, or other AI implementations outside the crony circlejerk.
I dont think its that.
I think they’ve all hit a performance wall behind closed doors, because the system behind LLMs is… Not up for the tasks ahead let’s say.
Theyre going to use this to go to investors and say ‘see we can’t make targets, were now hamstrung’
Morally binding like a constitution… By men with no morals that use the Constitution as toilet paper
And we know how he treats the constitution.
Asked if the deal was binding, Mr. Trump said: “I think it’s morally binding.”
Oh, for fuck’s sake.
Maybe he said “it’s mmm… Orally binding.” I don’t think he knows what a moral is.
Did theyjust compare a pinky promise to the Constitution of a country and said that a constitution is only morally binding?
That’s basically how Trump treats the regular US constitution, so why should this one be any different?
And it’s between people who we already know are morally compromised.
Morals are only binding if you have them.
