• BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    2 days ago

    Simply not true. MAGA has blocked justice at every turn, but they are steadily losing. It is taking a long time, but just because she hasn’t seen justice YET, doesn’t mean she never will. Murder has no statute of limitations, so even if it takes 20 years to get rid of MAGA, it will NEVER be too late to drag this guy into court, prosecute him, and give him a life sentence (Minnesota doesn’t have the death penalty), or possibly a death penalty (the Feds do).

    He has a potential, and likely, life/death sentence hanging over his head, and he will NEVER be able to sleep soundly, he will ALWAYS be looking over his shoulder, until the day he dies.

    • Forsho@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      2 days ago

      If you think she tried to stop them so that one guy allegedly can go to a fed prison.

      then you are missing the point.

      • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        Ironic that you read that comment and thought because it seemed to disagree with you on one aspect, that they “missed the point”.

        • Forsho@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          2 days ago

          she took direct action trying to stop them kidnapping people from the streets.

          The comment is talking about prison time to the shooter.

          How many direct action were done after her death, how many attempts to stop ice from kidnapping people, i just search such topic and last week ice literally shoot a latino delivery guy.

          So yes that comment is missing the point.

          • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            2 days ago

            Except that it’s easily possible, and common, to address one aspect of a topic without directly touching on everything involved. You made an assumption about what was meant. And now you’re super defensive about it. Cool.

            They were obviously just saying it’s wrong to claim “nobody did anything”. Something is being done. “Not enough was done” is not “nothing”. “Nothing” is hyperbole.

            You assumed the commenter meant “all that mattered to her is at least one Nazi paying for their crimes”. Which actually is just going out of your way to get mad for no reason. Be better.