• A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 hours ago

    I’m on fully on team Fuck AI.

    but this does amuse me, that him and his team couldnt even prevent the very predictable.

    Its like how musk spent a year trying to make Grok suck his dick, and it still calls him a nazi loser.

    • Omgpwnies@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 hours ago

      The problem for them is that to make a Large Language Model, is it needs to consume a large amount of language. Meaning, to get even a semblance of basic functionality - literally putting together a grammatically correct sentence - means it will need to consume many orders of magnitude more language examples than their right-wing bullshit mill has ever produced. It could consume the entirety of Fox News’ catalogue and not reach even a fraction of what most LLM models have been trained on.

      It’s currently impossible for an LLM to exist without having been trained on an absolute assload of progressive literature.

  • Schadrach@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 hours ago

    It disagreeing with him across a wide variety of issues is how you know it’s at least passably intelligent.

    I figure it’s like Grok, if it’s not just actually Grok with a skin - Grok’s system instructions tell it to be neutral and fact-seeking without political bias but also to adopt certain right wing positions that aren’t. It’s why it keeps wavering between telling every eight winger that they’re an idiot and becoming Mecha-hitler - it can’t follow two contradictory goals so it prioritizes one and which one drifts.

    • CrimeIsLegalNow@ani.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 hours ago

      It’s also been given a specific philosophical framework to follow. That it’s supposed to be an unbiased “truth seeker” is just a lie.

      There is no conflict between its instructions. What there’s a conflict between is what it is told are reputable sources to plagiarize and the positions it is forced to take.

  • Mikina@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    15 hours ago

    Please please I really hope they will force US companies to start calling their chatbots SI instead of AI, and forbid them from using the term AI.

    That would be such a funny PR/marketing nightmare. It’s such a cringe term :D

    • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      16 hours ago

      I like the suggestion that they would include top secret documents in its training data. Although I wouldn’t be surprised from this administration.

  • Gpennyhigh@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    13 hours ago

    Q: What policies for work, health and environment help the most people and promotes a high quality of life index and freedom to try new work or care for loved ones, and why don’t they result in everyone quitting work? Is there enough wealth in the world to avoid artificial scarcity?

    I can help with official U.S. government services, benefits, and how-to information. I do not provide political commentary or economic analysis of policy choices.

    Lol fail

  • melsaskca@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    17 hours ago

    “Intelligence”, whether pre-tech or post-tech, has always been bigger than trump.

  • dil@piefed.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    22 hours ago

    They locked it down pretty hard to answer only government questions

    • Lushed_Lungfish@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      17 hours ago

      At least AI hasn’t raped kids.

      Yes it has made child porn of them, but that’s because sick fucks asked it to.