• KyuubiNoKitsune@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    No, not what I meant. I meant environment tracking, hand tracking, everything.

    WE don’t need access to the camera for AR to work, the device just needs to be able to process the video stream.

    • Lodespawn@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      The problem isnt your privacy, it’s everyone else’s. If there are glasses with cameras then some arsehole is running around photographing people without their permission. You might argue that if you’re out in public then you can be photographed but that’s a shit attitude, if someone is walking around photographing people they should at least have to make it obvious so people can have a say at the time or at least know about it before it turns out they are now an AI deepfake pornstar.

        • Lodespawn@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 days ago

          Legal doesn’t mean right. There are a whole host of situations where you shouldn’t be filming and if someone is filming you want them to be obvious about it. Schools, playgrounds, change rooms etc.

            • Lodespawn@aussie.zone
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              3 days ago

              I think there’s an expectation that you can identify when someone is filming in playground. I’d be very fucking curious as to what someone thought they were doing if they were walking around filming my kids in a playground. If they are wearing AR glasses then there a reasonable assumption they are filming constantly and sending that data to whoever made the glasses.