• Display name@feddit.nu
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    63
    ·
    3 months ago

    Well it’s a one party dictatorship, and even though the sanctions at first might not have been for a good reason, the responsibility lies on the Cuban leadership.

    • Cowbee@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      How is the US engaging in a blockade around a country with a popular government the fault of the Cuban leadership?

        • Display name@feddit.nu
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          25
          ·
          3 months ago

          Meh, can you really say that it’s the proletarian dictatorship anymore when Cuba now has a privileged elite defending it’s grip on power against the poor majority? It’s more like they have become the bourgeoisie.

          • Display name@feddit.nu
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            17
            ·
            3 months ago

            Ah thanks. Maybe should have used the proper authoritarian. Dictatorship is just a much easier and more widely recognized term no?

            • well, every state is authoritarian. thats part of the self preservation of any governance, be it progressive or reactionary. if you wanna abolish states alltogether ask the anarchists, since i am an ml and think that authoritarian measures are good for the liberation of mankind.

              • Display name@feddit.nu
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                15
                ·
                3 months ago

                Haha yeah in a sense maybe. But the authoritarian meaning is that there’s no free or equal competition for the power so I mean there’s quite a difference between states where there are authoritan and democratic countries.

    • Alsephina@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      Yeah they should’ve had a dictatorship of two genocidal imperialist parties instead like the US

    • davel [he/him]@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      Well it’s a one party dictatorship

      Yes, the dictatorship of the party of the working class, or in other words a proletarian democracy.

      Meanwhile, whether one party or two or a hundred, we have a dictatorship of the capitalist class, or in other words a bourgeois democracy.

    • frippa@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      The communist party in Cuba (like every other party) can’t “advertise” itself, it’s in the constitution ffs. If you wanted to pick a socialist country to portray as a “one party scary dictatorship” Cuba is the least fit. Cuba is a zero-party democracy in a way.

    • d-RLY?@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      Obvious troll is obvious. If the overwhelming number of Cuban people really and truly didn’t support socialism. Then they would have taken over in a new revolution as they did getting rid of the US puppet state the last time. They have stood firm despite the literal attempts of US lead colour revolutions and refuse to be forced to bow to the self-appointed global police state that is the US. They aren’t the ones that should change to serve the rich fucks that steal from nations across the world. It is those rich fucks that should be put in the dirt so that peoples across the world could live their lives without fear.