Yes, it’s from a book called “Uncle John’s Bathroom Reader” and that book was resting on a closed toilet seat in a nation that only kind of uses the metric system in certain situations… however, you’d be surprised how much you can learn after a single visit to any local fast-food joint!

  • melsaskca@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    7 hours ago

    I use centimeters for certain things, but I call them “inches”.

  • motogo@feddit.dk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    12 hours ago

    It’s so impressively thought out. I got my mind blown when the physics teacher told us that 1 calorie is the amount of energy it takes to heat 1cc by 1°C. Suddenly you realise that someone actually put some effort into this whole system

  • itisileclerk@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    12 hours ago

    And the fact that Inch is not precisly defined. “Three grains of …” or “King’s thumb” is not a precise definition.

  • _cnt0@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    96
    ·
    1 day ago

    The paragraph on the meter should mention that their measuring error from the pole to the equator was .02%, which, without using satellites or even electricity, is fucking impressive.

  • seatwiggy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    18 hours ago

    It bugs me so much that they used the decimeter to define the liter and kilogram instead of using a meter to define a liter and gram

    • JasonDJ@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      18 hours ago

      Square-Cube law was gonna fuck with that one way or another. A meter is a very human-oriented unit of measure – but a cubic meter of water is a fuckton more than most people have to deal with in the normal course of business.

      And we’re gonna call that one gram of water?

      One liter of water being 1000cc or one kilogram keeps the scales much more useful, imo. And personally, being essentially a sentient bag of water with a handful of other elements gluing it together…I appreciate that.

      Ultimately it’s all the same, anyways. It’s just a matter of the words we call them, the math works out the same, if we just give them different names. That’s the point. Math is the constant. Assuming a space alien can understand Base10, we can explain the metric system in terms of universal constants that make sense in Base10.

      Unfortunately, all number systems are Base10…

  • Grandwolf319@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    19 hours ago

    If we were to make a meter today, I would think it would be a fraction of the speed of light.

    And on that note, I honestly think a base 12 number system would be easier in the long run.

    • schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      12 hours ago

      The meter is nowadays literally defined as the distance light travels in a certain amount of time, ie through the speed of light.

    • iocase@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      19 hours ago

      Coincidentally we accidentally got really close to 1/300 000 000th the speed of light in a vacuum. 299 792 458 m/s.

  • Hapankaali@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    56
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    I think this snippet misrepresents the accuracy of the former definition of the metre. Sure, it’s no longer the distance from the equator to the pole (the modern definition uses the speed of light and the period of transition for a particular atom), but the difference is quite small. The circumference of the Earth around the poles (so 4 times the distance from equator to pole) is 40007.863 km. In Napoleonic times scientists had a pretty good idea what the shape of the Earth was.

    • brem@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      20
      ·
      1 day ago

      Earth squeezes and stretches and wobbles & rotates. Time as we know it changes in length because it is the common nature of “time” to become chaos which then becomes order. Hylomorphism or Impermanence is to Entropy as measurement is to the fundamentals of size. Who is to say that the distance between two points should be constrained to the barriers of human existence & understanding. All we have is pictures & words, maybe a few trinkets that will become dust that becomes something else that attempts to quantify reality.

      • Hapankaali@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        38
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 day ago

        Earth squeezes and stretches and wobbles & rotates.

        Sort of, yeah, Earth is a bit wider around the equatorial axis than around the polar one.

        Time as we know it changes in length because it is the common nature of “time” to become chaos which then becomes order. Hylomorphism or Impermanence is to Entropy as measurement is to the fundamentals of size. Who is to say that the distance between two points should be constrained to the barriers of human existence & understanding. All we have is pictures & words, maybe a few trinkets that will become dust that becomes something else that attempts to quantify reality.

        This reads like an unfortunate confluence of psychosis, psychoactive substances and LLMs.

        • brem@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          1 day ago

          While I can’t speak for my chemical imbalances, I can certainly assure you I am %100 not a fucking algorithm or some lame ass excuse for manufactured digital intelligence…

        • brem@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          29
          ·
          1 day ago

          Sort of, yeah, Earth is a bit wider around the equatorial axis than around the polar one.

          Thanks for explaining that a fucking ball is easier to squeeze at it’s widest part, genius.

          • MartianSands@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            18
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 day ago

            What are you talking about? That isn’t what they said, and a ball doesn’t have a widest point. That’s more or less the definition of a ball.

            The distance between the two poles is smaller than the distance from one side to the other following the equator. The earth isn’t quite a ball, it’s a bit squashed because of way it spins

            • brem@lemmy.worldOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              14
              ·
              1 day ago

              Okay, a ball is equally wide but sometimes it gets squeezed and becomes tallish

      • creamfresh@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        1 day ago

        To agree on a unified measurement system for things like engineering, science and commerce across nations and cultures is a question of practicability though, not pseudophilosophical ramblings.

        • brem@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          8
          ·
          1 day ago

          I say we measure everything with how angry it makes the French.

  • SourDragon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    1 day ago

    Uncle John’s bathroom reader! I know this has nothing to do with the metric system, but I saw the toilet paper roll around the page number and got a surge of happy brain sauce due to the happy memories of all the copies I owned through the years: 2

  • bridgeenjoyer@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 day ago

    I have this book, its great! Some funny bullshit in there

    Hmm… What We Did Before Smartphones. I should write a book so the Young’s dont forget ye olden ways.

  • HakFoo@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    2 days ago

    The other fun thing is with the new calendar, they literslly reset the count to year 1. The coins for the first few years literally said “l’an 7” or “l’an 11”.

    “We decide when history starts” is a hell of a sentiment.

      • bampop@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        It would have worked so well. 2 digit timestamp gives you 15 (old)minute accuracy which is just perfect for appointments and organizing your day. Digital minutes would be a bit longer than old minutes which is fine for bus/train times etc. Digital seconds a bit shorter than old seconds which is great for timing things. I always thought a second was a wee bit longer than it ought to be anyway.

    • Successful_Try543@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      “We decide when history starts” is a hell of a sentiment.

      It’s only consequencial if you want to get rid of anything that was imposed by the church.

    • brem@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 day ago

      I like that sentiment if it starts with us having the knowledge to be better than before