• estrange_alien@leminal.space
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    2 days ago

    pretty sure that racism in the days of yore was still racist (please remember who decided what was appropriate in common parlance back then)

    • CyberEgg@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      42
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      And nobody denied that. The statement was “racism was normal in those days”, and not “the n-word wasn’t racist in those days”.

      • CrimeIsLegalNow@ani.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        30
        ·
        2 days ago

        You’re not allowed to criticize or point out Southern Klans members because it was the style of the time.

        Lemmy’s just becoming worse and worse these days.

        • lime!@feddit.nu
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          20
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          2 days ago

          …are you okay? automatically assuming the worst possible meaning of ambiguous statements doesn’t seem healthy.

          what about this: “pointing the klansmen out to people back then was harder because the average person was more racist.”

            • MouldyCat@feddit.uk
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              22 hours ago

              “If you run into an asshole in the morning, you ran into an asshole. If you run into assholes all day, you’re the asshole.”

              or, of course, it could be that you’re just so much better than everyone else, right?

            • PhoenixDog@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              11
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              2 days ago

              Just because you refuse to understand that acceptance of a word, no matter how foul, was entirely dependant on the region it was used doesn’t mean Lemmy or anyone else is accepting it. People here just understand that Britain in the 1950s was far different in cultural acceptance than the US in 1950.

              Just like the USA using “That’s gay” as a casual insult as late as the mid 2000s is now considered inappropriate today. I’m queer and I know Brits who still say “pass me a fag”. Guess who isn’t upset about hearing that because I’m not a moron.

            • lime!@feddit.nu
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              8
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              2 days ago

              they do say that if you always expect the worst you’re never disappointed… but it definitely won’t make you happy.

        • gmtom@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          1 day ago

          There are things in the world to legitimately be outraged about if you want to be outraged. You don’t need to force yourself to be angry at shit like this.

      • Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        2 days ago

        The Hayes Code didn’t apply to books at all, it was movie specific. I assumed they were talking about the dominant culture at the time.

        • MinnesotaGoddam@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          2 days ago

          it just cracks me up because if you look for Hays violating shit, it’s everywhere back then. If they wanted to sing about sex, they sang about food.